Re: [PR] IGNITE-25921 Fix treating RO txn as applicable for direct mapping [ignite-3]

2025-07-18 Thread via GitHub


ascherbakoff commented on code in PR #6272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/6272#discussion_r2215904427


##
modules/client/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/client/tx/DirectTxUtils.java:
##
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ public static CompletableFuture 
resolveChannel(
 String opNode = pm == null ? null : pm.nodeConsistentId();
 
 if (tx != null) {
-return tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != null ? opNode : 
tx.nodeName();
+return !tx.isReadOnly() && tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != 
null ? opNode : tx.nodeName();

Review Comment:
   It wasn't imlemented yet. I've created a ticket:
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-25956
   



##
modules/client/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/client/tx/DirectTxUtils.java:
##
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ public static CompletableFuture 
resolveChannel(
 String opNode = pm == null ? null : pm.nodeConsistentId();
 
 if (tx != null) {
-return tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != null ? opNode : 
tx.nodeName();
+return !tx.isReadOnly() && tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != 
null ? opNode : tx.nodeName();

Review Comment:
   It wasn't implemented yet. I've created a ticket:
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-25956
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [PR] IGNITE-25921 Fix treating RO txn as applicable for direct mapping [ignite-3]

2025-07-18 Thread via GitHub


korlov42 commented on code in PR #6272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/6272#discussion_r2215869562


##
modules/client/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/client/tx/DirectTxUtils.java:
##
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ public static CompletableFuture 
resolveChannel(
 String opNode = pm == null ? null : pm.nodeConsistentId();
 
 if (tx != null) {
-return tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != null ? opNode : 
tx.nodeName();
+return !tx.isReadOnly() && tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != 
null ? opNode : tx.nodeName();

Review Comment:
   if my understanding correct, this will disable direct mapping for RO 
transactions. Won't better to support direct mapping for RO transactions as 
well?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [PR] IGNITE-25921 Fix treating RO txn as applicable for direct mapping [ignite-3]

2025-07-18 Thread via GitHub


ascherbakoff closed pull request #6272: IGNITE-25921 Fix treating RO txn as 
applicable for direct mapping
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/6272


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [PR] IGNITE-25921 Fix treating RO txn as applicable for direct mapping [ignite-3]

2025-07-18 Thread via GitHub


ptupitsyn commented on code in PR #6272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/6272#discussion_r2215821310


##
modules/client/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/client/tx/DirectTxUtils.java:
##
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ public static CompletableFuture 
resolveChannel(
 String opNode = pm == null ? null : pm.nodeConsistentId();
 
 if (tx != null) {
-return tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != null ? opNode : 
tx.nodeName();
+return !tx.isReadOnly() && tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != 
null ? opNode : tx.nodeName();

Review Comment:
   ```suggestion
   return !tx.isReadOnly() && tx.hasCommitPartition() && opNode != 
null 
   ? opNode 
   : tx.nodeName();
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



[PR] IGNITE-25921 Fix treating RO txn as applicable for direct mapping [ignite-3]

2025-07-17 Thread via GitHub


ascherbakoff opened a new pull request, #6272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/6272

   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-25921


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]