Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Try to use an OSGi-compliant way of loading JSR 223 script engines (#79)

2016-09-12 Thread Ignasi Barrera
+1! Many thanks @demobox! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/79#issuecomment-246259756

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Use same bundle version as in jclouds/project/java-xmlbuilder.verison (#81)

2016-09-12 Thread Andrea Turli
Merged #81. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/81#event-785928303

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Use same bundle version as in jclouds/project/java-xmlbuilder.verison (#81)

2016-09-12 Thread Andrea Turli
@demobox lgtm too -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/81#issuecomment-246342026

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Use same bundle version as in jclouds/project/java-xmlbuilder.verison (#81)

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Phillips
Thanks, @neykov! Pending the CI build, looks good to me. For reference for anyone who's interested, this is the bundle, I think: http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ca%3A%22org.apache.servicemix.bundles.java-xmlbuilder%22 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Use same bundle version as in jclouds/project/java-xmlbuilder.verison (#81)

2016-09-12 Thread Andrea Turli
thanks @neykov -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/81#issuecomment-246346027

[jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Use same bundle version as in jclouds/project/java-xmlbuilder.verison (#81)

2016-09-12 Thread Svet
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/project/pom.xml#L235 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/81 -- Commit Summary -- * Use same bundle version as in jclouds/project/java-xmlbuilder.verison -- File Changes

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Some handles were not properly closed (#1007)

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Gaul
> @@ -701,14 +702,11 @@ public void downloadBlob(String container, String name, > File destination, Execut > Futures.getUnchecked(Futures.allAsList(results)); > >} catch (IOException e) { > - // cleanup, attempt to delete large file > - if (raf != null) { > -

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1177) Azure object encryption

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Gaul (JIRA)
Andrew Gaul created JCLOUDS-1177: Summary: Azure object encryption Key: JCLOUDS-1177 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1177 Project: jclouds Issue Type: New Feature

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-532: Properly close HTTP streams (#700)

2016-09-12 Thread vpanghal
@nacx This seems to breaking swift delete operation. Swift Delete operation used to be Idempotent but after this change second delete operation is failing with these stack traces `org.jclouds.http.HttpResponseException: java.io.IOException: stream is closed connecting to DELETE

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1177) Azure object encryption

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Gaul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1177: - Description: Microsoft announced general availability of object encryption:

[jclouds/jclouds] Add keystone authentication with an existing token (#1009)

2016-09-12 Thread Olivier Lemasle
This pull request adds the possibility to use JClouds for OpenStack with a pre-existing Keystone token. Cf. http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/identity/v2/?expanded=authenticate-detail To authenticate with a tenant name and a token, you can do: ``` Properties config = new Properties();

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1161: Make AWSS3BlobRequestSignerV4 the default signer. (#1008)

2016-09-12 Thread Shri Javadekar
Added a new live test, specifically run against eu-central-1 region. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1008#issuecomment-246511656

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Add keystone authentication with an existing token (#1009)

2016-09-12 Thread Zack Shoylev
Not a bad idea to have that as an option! However, I have to point out that jclouds retry mechanisms will not be able to re-authenticate and get a new token once the token expires, so this type of authentication might not work in some user environments. I think it's still worth it to have it.

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Some handles were not properly closed (#1007)

2016-09-12 Thread Zack Shoylev
> @@ -701,14 +702,11 @@ public void downloadBlob(String container, String name, > File destination, Execut > Futures.getUnchecked(Futures.allAsList(results)); > >} catch (IOException e) { > - // cleanup, attempt to delete large file > - if (raf != null) { > -

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] JCLOUDS-1161: Make AWSS3BlobRequestSignerV4 the default signer. (#1008)

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Gaul
Tests show the following errors: ``` $ mvn integration-test -pl :aws-s3 -Plive -Dtest.aws-s3.identity="${JCLOUDS_IDENTITY}" -Dtest.aws-s3.credential="${JCLOUDS_CREDENTIAL}" -Dtest=AWSS3BlobSignerLiveTest ... Failed tests:

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1174) Transient and Azure blob do not filter out marker blobs from blob exists

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Gaul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15486306#comment-15486306 ] Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1174: -- [~ritazh] [~jasonpoon] Could you investigate this? >

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1174) Transient and Azure blob do not filter out marker blobs from blob exists

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Gaul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1174: - Labels: azureblob transient (was: ) > Transient and Azure blob do not filter out marker blobs

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1177) Azure object encryption

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Gaul (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15486319#comment-15486319 ] Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-1177: -- [~jasonpoon] I believe you would add a new method to

[jclouds/jclouds-karaf] JCLOUDS-1005: Add Backblaze B2 (#82)

2016-09-12 Thread Andrew Gaul
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/82 -- Commit Summary -- * JCLOUDS-1005: Add Backblaze B2 -- File Changes -- M feature/pom.xml (1) M feature/src/main/resources/feature.xml (5) M