Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-1304: add azure customdata, JCLOUDS-1305: add support for ssh keys in keyvault (#398)

2017-07-10 Thread Vikas Rangarajan
Thanks for the review comments @nacx ! I do need to add (back) the code to actually use the keyvaultidAndSecret, will do that. Will address the other comments as well. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Async interface changes for putBlob (#1114)

2017-07-10 Thread kishorebattula
@nacx Please let me know what are the next steps towards this change. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1114#issuecomment-314311148

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Async interface changes for putBlob (#1114)

2017-07-10 Thread kishorebattula
@nacx Thanks for the detailed description on injecting optional async blob store context. I have followed the inheritance approach and updated the pull request. I have also made changes to invoke function to return ListenableFuture. Please let me know any other changes to be made in this pull

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Async interface changes for putBlob (#1114)

2017-07-10 Thread kishore
@kishore25kumar pushed 2 commits. 20c84d2 Added binding optional async blob store in base class 56ff532 Fixed checkstyle issues -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Async interface changes for putBlob (#1114)

2017-07-10 Thread Ignasi Barrera
>I have also made changes to invoke function to return ListenableFuture. That was the suggestion to simplify the base driver class code, if that didn't introduce significant overhead. I think it actually makes sense for the driver implementations to have the invoke and invokeAsync signatures

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Async interface changes for putBlob (#1114)

2017-07-10 Thread kishore
@kishore25kumar pushed 1 commit. 9a6b749 Changed invoke method return type to ListenableFuture -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Async interface changes for putBlob (#1114)

2017-07-10 Thread kishorebattula
@nacx Sorry I took it wrong. Wrapping the sync result in the future makes more sense. I this way no driver needs to be touched. I have made changes to my pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Async interface changes for putBlob (#1114)

2017-07-10 Thread Ignasi Barrera
> Wrapping the sync result in the future makes more sense. I this way no driver > needs to be touched. I have made changes to my pull request. My comment wasn't clear. Thanks! :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on