[jira] [Updated] (RYA-177) Review License on Rya Dependencies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Mihalik updated RYA-177: -- Assignee: Caleb Meier (was: Aaron Mihalik) > Review License on Rya Dependencies > -- > > Key: RYA-177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177 > Project: Rya > Issue Type: Task >Affects Versions: 3.2.10 >Reporter: Aaron Mihalik >Assignee: Caleb Meier >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.2.10 > > > * jgridshift:jgridshift appears to be LGPL licensed > (https://github.com/floscher/jGridShift/blob/master/LICENSE). You may > not use this software. It looks like it was not appropriately marked in > its pom which is why the configuration from Rya's parent apache.pom did > not catch it. This is brought in via org.geotools.xsd:gt-xsd-gml3. > * colt (http://dst.lbl.gov/ACSSoftware/colt/) appears to be another > brought in by com.tinkerpop.blueprints:blueprints-core > * com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305 is another example of GPL licensing. > While the artifact appears to have the ASL tagged on the pom, all > Findbugs documentation states that the project is GPL. > I would recommend to make a pass over your dependencies to verify that > you aren't depending on any projects which are licensed with a license > on this list: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. See > http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html for more details. > The above three examples were found via a brief glance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (RYA-177) Review License on Rya Dependencies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Mihalik updated RYA-177: -- Fix Version/s: 3.2.10 > Review License on Rya Dependencies > -- > > Key: RYA-177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177 > Project: Rya > Issue Type: Task >Affects Versions: 3.2.10 >Reporter: Aaron Mihalik >Assignee: David W. Lotts >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.2.10 > > > * jgridshift:jgridshift appears to be LGPL licensed > (https://github.com/floscher/jGridShift/blob/master/LICENSE). You may > not use this software. It looks like it was not appropriately marked in > its pom which is why the configuration from Rya's parent apache.pom did > not catch it. This is brought in via org.geotools.xsd:gt-xsd-gml3. > * colt (http://dst.lbl.gov/ACSSoftware/colt/) appears to be another > brought in by com.tinkerpop.blueprints:blueprints-core > * com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305 is another example of GPL licensing. > While the artifact appears to have the ASL tagged on the pom, all > Findbugs documentation states that the project is GPL. > I would recommend to make a pass over your dependencies to verify that > you aren't depending on any projects which are licensed with a license > on this list: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. See > http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html for more details. > The above three examples were found via a brief glance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (RYA-177) Review License on Rya Dependencies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Puja Valiyil updated RYA-177: -- Assignee: David W. Lotts > Review License on Rya Dependencies > -- > > Key: RYA-177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177 > Project: Rya > Issue Type: Task >Affects Versions: 3.2.10 >Reporter: Aaron Mihalik >Assignee: David W. Lotts >Priority: Blocker > > * jgridshift:jgridshift appears to be LGPL licensed > (https://github.com/floscher/jGridShift/blob/master/LICENSE). You may > not use this software. It looks like it was not appropriately marked in > its pom which is why the configuration from Rya's parent apache.pom did > not catch it. This is brought in via org.geotools.xsd:gt-xsd-gml3. > * colt (http://dst.lbl.gov/ACSSoftware/colt/) appears to be another > brought in by com.tinkerpop.blueprints:blueprints-core > * com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305 is another example of GPL licensing. > While the artifact appears to have the ASL tagged on the pom, all > Findbugs documentation states that the project is GPL. > I would recommend to make a pass over your dependencies to verify that > you aren't depending on any projects which are licensed with a license > on this list: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. See > http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html for more details. > The above three examples were found via a brief glance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (RYA-177) Review License on Rya Dependencies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Mihalik updated RYA-177: -- Affects Version/s: 3.2.10 > Review License on Rya Dependencies > -- > > Key: RYA-177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177 > Project: Rya > Issue Type: Task >Affects Versions: 3.2.10 >Reporter: Aaron Mihalik >Priority: Blocker > > * jgridshift:jgridshift appears to be LGPL licensed > (https://github.com/floscher/jGridShift/blob/master/LICENSE). You may > not use this software. It looks like it was not appropriately marked in > its pom which is why the configuration from Rya's parent apache.pom did > not catch it. This is brought in via org.geotools.xsd:gt-xsd-gml3. > * colt (http://dst.lbl.gov/ACSSoftware/colt/) appears to be another > brought in by com.tinkerpop.blueprints:blueprints-core > * com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305 is another example of GPL licensing. > While the artifact appears to have the ASL tagged on the pom, all > Findbugs documentation states that the project is GPL. > I would recommend to make a pass over your dependencies to verify that > you aren't depending on any projects which are licensed with a license > on this list: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. See > http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html for more details. > The above three examples were found via a brief glance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (RYA-177) Review License on Rya Dependencies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron Mihalik updated RYA-177: -- Issue Type: Task (was: Bug) > Review License on Rya Dependencies > -- > > Key: RYA-177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RYA-177 > Project: Rya > Issue Type: Task >Affects Versions: 3.2.10 >Reporter: Aaron Mihalik >Priority: Blocker > > * jgridshift:jgridshift appears to be LGPL licensed > (https://github.com/floscher/jGridShift/blob/master/LICENSE). You may > not use this software. It looks like it was not appropriately marked in > its pom which is why the configuration from Rya's parent apache.pom did > not catch it. This is brought in via org.geotools.xsd:gt-xsd-gml3. > * colt (http://dst.lbl.gov/ACSSoftware/colt/) appears to be another > brought in by com.tinkerpop.blueprints:blueprints-core > * com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305 is another example of GPL licensing. > While the artifact appears to have the ASL tagged on the pom, all > Findbugs documentation states that the project is GPL. > I would recommend to make a pass over your dependencies to verify that > you aren't depending on any projects which are licensed with a license > on this list: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. See > http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html for more details. > The above three examples were found via a brief glance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
