On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I fear this is not correct. I cloned notmuch from Carl's git repository,
> > and whenever I press 'RET' while the point is over the subject line, the
> > result is the same as pressing 'h': the subject information gets toggled.
>
>
hehe, this version compiles but has the logic inverted. Removing the ! from
your patch makes it actually work as intended :--).
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/PATCH-Prevent-data-loss-caused-by-SIGINT-during-notmuch-new-tp677501p684691.html
Sent from the notmuch mailing
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little
David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> > > helped (just
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:46:40 +0200, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > I don't think this can be solved only in Makefile. From my look at dme's
> > repo, he adds a new subcomand 'part', which is used by the UI. So if you
> > want to use the new UI and your
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Bhaskara Marthi wrote:
> Hi all, I'm trying to build notmuch on os x (master branch from today). I
> got the ports for gmime and xapian, and installed talloc from source, with
> some minor hitches (just getting talloc alone from samba failed on autoconf
> due to lack of
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 03:41:32 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> It works really nice and I get the (unmeasured) feeling that it is
> faster too (but then it might just be the lack of my additional patches
> which slow things down :-)).
I'm not sure why it would be faster. If you have a long
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo
wrote:
> David Edmondson wrote:
> > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> > helped (just pushed).
> >
> > Toggling the visibility of
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:46:40 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I don't think this can be solved only in Makefile. From my look at dme's
> repo, he adds a new subcomand 'part', which is used by the UI. So if you
> want to use the new UI and your other features, you need to merge the
> things together.
ir := compat
> extra_cflags += -I$(dir)
>
> -notmuch_compat_srcs =
> +notmuch_compat_srcs :=
>
> ifneq ($(HAVE_GETLINE),1)
> notmuch_compat_srcs += $(dir)/getline.c $(dir)/getdelim.c
> --
> 1.7.0.2
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100329/654bca16/attachment.html>
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:13:26 -0500, Ben Gamari
wrote:
> /* success */
> case NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS:
> state->added_messages++;
> - tag_inbox_and_unread (message);
> + for (tag=state->new_tags; *tag != NULL; tag++)
> + notmuch_message_add_tag
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:57:30 +0200, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:13:26 -0500, Ben Gamari > > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Add a new_tags option in the [messages] section of the configuration
>
> Oh, sorry. I thought it is so trivial, that I didn't even compile it for
> master. The right version is here:
Thanks, that worked fine now. I pushed it to my branch.
Sebastian
Hi all, I'm trying to build notmuch on os x (master branch from today). I
got the ports for gmime and xapian, and installed talloc from source, with
some minor hitches (just getting talloc alone from samba failed on autoconf
due to lack of libreplace.m4, so I installed all of samba from a port; a
Hi all, I'm trying to build notmuch on os x (master branch from today). I
got the ports for gmime and xapian, and installed talloc from source, with
some minor hitches (just getting talloc alone from samba failed on autoconf
due to lack of libreplace.m4, so I installed all of samba from a port; a
Oh, sorry. I thought it is so trivial, that I didn't even compile it for
master. The right version is here:
Thanks, that worked fine now. I pushed it to my branch.
Sebastian
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:13:26 -0500, Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com wrote:
/* success */
case NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS:
state-added_messages++;
- tag_inbox_and_unread (message);
+ for (tag=state-new_tags; *tag != NULL; tag++)
+
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Bhaskara Marthi wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying to build notmuch on os x (master branch from today). I
got the ports for gmime and xapian, and installed talloc from source, with
some minor hitches (just getting talloc alone from samba failed on autoconf
due to lack of
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:46:40 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
I don't think this can be solved only in Makefile. From my look at dme's
repo, he adds a new subcomand 'part', which is used by the UI. So if you
want to use the new UI
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo fcarr...@yahoo.com.br
wrote:
David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
helped (just pushed).
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo fcarr...@yahoo.com.br
wrote:
David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
message. That was not
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
I fear this is not correct. I cloned notmuch from Carl's git repository,
and whenever I press 'RET' while the point is over the subject line, the
result is the same as pressing 'h': the subject information gets toggled.
hehe, this version compiles but has the logic inverted. Removing the ! from
your patch makes it actually work as intended :--).
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/PATCH-Prevent-data-loss-caused-by-SIGINT-during-notmuch-new-tp677501p684691.html
Sent from the notmuch mailing
23 matches
Mail list logo
