Sebastian Spaeth writes:
> On 2010-09-21, Rob Browning wrote:
>> Conceptually what I'd like for it to do, is reference count -- only mark
>> the message deleted if every occurrence (across all maildirs) is marked
>> trashed (T).
>
> Right, but that is trickier than might appear at first sight.
ignature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100921/cdb3e2fa/attachment.pgp>
e: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100921/adb2fd80/attachment.pgp>
not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100921/d1c45125/attachment.pgp>
chment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100921/d9190293/attachment.pgp>
get all associated filenames with a mail id.
sebastian
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100921/ee4274c6/attachment.pgp>
...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100921/f5b02235/attachment-0001.htm>
Current master seems to fail to install properly:
$ make DESTDIR=`readlink -f dest` install
install-completion
mkdir -p /home/pioto/git/notmuch/dest/etc/bash_completion.d
install -m0644 completion/notmuch-completion.bash
/home/pioto/git/notmuch/dest/etc/bash_completion.d/notmuch
mkdir
notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100921/69f809b7/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:44:29 +0200
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Right that would be a problem. But I cannot do reference counting
> unless notmuch can give me the number of copies it knows about for a
> given mail id (and internally it does know all associated file paths,
> so it would be a simple
On 2010-09-21, Rob Browning wrote:
Conceptually what I'd like for it to do, is reference count -- only mark
the message deleted if every occurrence (across all maildirs) is marked
trashed (T).
Right, but that is trickier than might appear at first sight.
I parse those file names which notmuch
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:44:29 +0200
Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
Right that would be a problem. But I cannot do reference counting
unless notmuch can give me the number of copies it knows about for a
given mail id (and internally it does know all associated file paths,
so it
Current master seems to fail to install properly:
$ make DESTDIR=`readlink -f dest` install
install-completion
mkdir -p /home/pioto/git/notmuch/dest/etc/bash_completion.d
install -m0644 completion/notmuch-completion.bash
/home/pioto/git/notmuch/dest/etc/bash_completion.d/notmuch
mkdir
It seems to me that development on notmuch has slowed down recently? Lots
of patches sitting in the patch queue and not much movement on the git
repository? Am I missing where the development is going on?
--
Scott Henson
___
notmuch mailing list
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:38:46 -0400, Scott Henson sc...@foolishpride.org wrote:
It seems to me that development on notmuch has slowed down recently? Lots
of patches sitting in the patch queue and not much movement on the git
repository? Am I missing where the development is going on?
Yes. The
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:29:18 -0400, Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org wrote:
Current master seems to fail to install properly:
$ make DESTDIR=`readlink -f dest` install
...
install -m0644 test/libnotmuch.so.1.1.0
/home/pioto/git/notmuch/dest/usr/lib64/
install: cannot stat
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:32:30 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Also, if anyone has any suggestions for things that we could do to
improve things if I have to disappear again in the future, then I
would be happy to do what I can.
Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:12 -0400, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, Carl. The most obvious thing I can think of is delegating some
lieutenants to handle processing patches. There definitely are some
worthy candidates (who are kind of already doing this already). Even
Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de writes:
On 2010-09-21, Rob Browning wrote:
Conceptually what I'd like for it to do, is reference count -- only mark
the message deleted if every occurrence (across all maildirs) is marked
trashed (T).
Right, but that is trickier than might appear at
19 matches
Mail list logo
