Hi
[I know I am really late on this one ;)]
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:16:53 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:23:01 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > GNU Emacs interface comes with 2 functions I am not sure I am
> > using correctly.
> >
> > What's the difference between searching
Simple version of the `notmuch-hello' test, some tests of the matrix
reflection code and the 're:' stripping code.
---
emacs/notmuch-test.el| 62 +++--
test/emacs-ert |3 ++
test/emacs.expected-output/emacs-ert | 20
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 04:25 PM, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > (c-cleanup-list . (space-before-funcall))
>
> This line makes my emacs prompt that it "may not be safe" -- it seems
> impolite to ask users just opening up the code within emacs to
in emacs itself.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101125/c880bb61/attachment.pgp>
Add ERT tests to cover various settings of `notmuch-fcc-dirs'.
---
emacs/notmuch-test.el| 96 ++
test/emacs-ert | 17 ++
test/emacs.expected-output/emacs-ert |9 +++
3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 0
The previous code did not correctly identify an old configuration and,
as a consequence, broke new configurations.
Minor re-arrangement to assist testing.
---
emacs/notmuch-maildir-fcc.el | 107 +-
1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff
ERT is for Emacs Lisp Regression Testing, from
https://github.com/ohler/ert.git.
The ERT files added here were extracted from the ERT repository.
The 'basic' test should ignore emacs backup files (*~).
---
test/basic|2 +-
test/ert/ert-batch.el | 152 +++
test/ert/ert-run.el
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101125/0de0ec93/attachment.pgp>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101125/6be11682/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > I, for one, simply have a get-mail script
> > which calls offlineimap, notmuch new, and finally my sorting
> > script. This seems like a more straightforward way to manage
L:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101125/d83d5bd2/attachment.pgp>
gp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101125/54d82f07/attachment.pgp>
the messages in these folders
and run a big notmuch tag command, but this sounds slow and potentially
error-prone.
Are there good solutions to this problem?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:27:45 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am I alone thinking it could be cool to specify a post-processing script
> to run after 'notmuch new' ?
>
> Currently, one can tell notmuch to add a unique tag but I guess we could
> extend this to something much smarter. I
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
I, for one, simply have a get-mail script
which calls offlineimap, notmuch new, and finally my sorting
script. This seems like a more
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:20:39 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
I, for one, simply have a get-mail script
which calls
The previous code did not correctly identify an old configuration and,
as a consequence, broke new configurations.
Minor re-arrangement to assist testing.
---
emacs/notmuch-maildir-fcc.el | 107 +-
1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff
Add ERT tests to cover various settings of `notmuch-fcc-dirs'.
---
emacs/notmuch-test.el| 96 ++
test/emacs-ert | 17 ++
test/emacs.expected-output/emacs-ert |9 +++
3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 0
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 11/24/2010 04:25 PM, Michal Sojka wrote:
(c-cleanup-list . (space-before-funcall))
This line makes my emacs prompt that it may not be safe -- it seems
impolite to ask users just opening up the code within emacs to execute
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:59:08 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
ERT is for Emacs Lisp Regression Testing, from
https://github.com/ohler/ert.git.
The ERT files added here were extracted from the ERT repository.
---
test/ert/ert-batch.el | 152 +++
test/ert/ert-run.el | 687
Simple version of the `notmuch-hello' test, some tests of the matrix
reflection code and the 're:' stripping code.
---
emacs/notmuch-test.el| 62 +++--
test/emacs-ert |3 ++
test/emacs.expected-output/emacs-ert | 20
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:40:46 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
So my inclination is to remove the prefixes and then recommend that you
do:
notmuch search --output=threads | sed -e 's/^/thread:'
in your script.
Hey, Carl. I think that's reasonable.
jamie.
Hi
[I know I am really late on this one ;)]
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:16:53 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:23:01 +0200, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote:
GNU Emacs interface comes with 2 functions I am not sure I am
using correctly.
What's the
23 matches
Mail list logo
