On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:02:45 -0700, Mueen Nawaz wrote:
> I think you misunderstood me. A part of me suspects this has something
> to do with my not explaining myself, but who's to say?
Same here, apparently :D
> I'm experimenting with notmuch, and if I can translate everything I
> currently do
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:15:00 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:26:46 -0800, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > Hey, folks. I just pushed a couple of patches to my "crypto" branch [0]
> > that add support for auto-tagging of multipart/signed and
> >
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:48:45 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Bind "n" to widget-forward and "p" to widget-backward to unify the
> interface since other notmuch major mode also accept "n" and "p" to
> navigation.
> ---
> emacs/notmuch-hello.el |2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0
> > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a
> > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an
> > answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved through
> > some indicators via message mode or similar means? e.g.:
> >
> > <#notmuch
Calling notmuch-help in notmuch-hello-mode results in error
"apply: Wrong type argument: listp, keymap"
As this is the very first screen new users see, a failing
notmuch-help can be considered a marketing catastrophe.
Appears to be in introduced in commit 9ccd978665103a20
(patch
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:48:44 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> widget-end-of-line checks eolp to decide whether C-e in a fixed size
> field should go to the end of the text in the field or the end of
> the field itself. So put a trailing white space to pad the search
> field.
>
> Previous behavior:
>
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:23:46 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
wrote:
>
> With 60k messages and 12k tagged as sent:
>
> $ time notmuch tag +sent -- from:flo at chaoflow.net
>
> real 0m8.561s
> user 0m8.069s
> sys 0m0.212s
>
> $ time notmuch tag +sent -- from:flo at chaoflow.net and not tag:sent
>
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
wrote:
>
> With my current setup (implying that it might be already possible with
> notmuch but I am not aware how), when sending a message it is put in
> "/home/cfl/mail/sent" via Fcc.
This can be configured with the variable
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
With my current setup (implying that it might be already possible with
notmuch but I am not aware how), when sending a message it is put in
/home/cfl/mail/sent via Fcc.
This can be configured with the variable
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:23:46 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
With 60k messages and 12k tagged as sent:
$ time notmuch tag +sent -- from:f...@chaoflow.net
real 0m8.561s
user 0m8.069s
sys 0m0.212s
$ time notmuch tag +sent -- from:f...@chaoflow.net and not tag:sent
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:15:00 -0800, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:26:46 -0800, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, folks. I just pushed a couple of patches to my crypto branch [0]
that add support for auto-tagging of
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:02:45 -0700, Mueen Nawaz mu...@nawaz.org wrote:
I think you misunderstood me. A part of me suspects this has something
to do with my not explaining myself, but who's to say?G
Same here, apparently :D
I'm experimenting with notmuch, and if I can translate everything I
Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a
WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an
answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved through
some indicators via message mode or similar means? e.g.:
#notmuch tag=WAITING
Hi Florian!
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a
WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an
answer. Currently I set this manually. Could this be achieved
14 matches
Mail list logo
