Quoth Pieter Praet on Jul 02 at 4:20 pm:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:37:11 -0400, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> Non-text part: multipart/alternative
> > On Jul 1, 2011 10:55 AM, "Austin Clements" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > > > Ok, even though my very
On 3 July 2011 08:44, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 03:14:03 -0400, servilio wrote:
>>
>> I think there is no need for tags on master, "make dist" should only
>> be run on the "release" branch, right?
>
> It isn't just about make dist (which I anyway thinks makes sense to run
> on
On 3 July 2011 08:32, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:23:02 -0500, Jed Brown wrote:
>
>> Remind me of why bugfix patches can't (usually) be applied to the
>> release branch first, then merged into master?
>
> Yes, that might work out for a "release" consisting of one or two
>
Fixes broken build on DragonFly BSD
Signed-off-by: Robin Green
---
lib/Makefile.local |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Makefile.local b/lib/Makefile.local
index fe42920..88d8deb 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile.local
+++ b/lib/Makefile.local
@@ -76,7 +76,7
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110703/830aaec8/attachment-0001.pgp>
: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110703/c281f4b6/attachment.pgp>
The patch rewrites `notmuch-show-message-extent' to be more
robust. The main goal is to make it work as expected if point is
invisible. Besides, there are no more point movements and
property search functions are used instead manual loops. The
comment regarding properties strangeness is removed
On 2 July 2011 13:30, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:59:04 -0400, servilio wrote:
>> What about having Carl do the merging of features into a develop
>> branch[1], then the release manager prepares a release in a release
>> branch, merging back and tagging into master when release
On 2 July 2011 13:30, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:59:04 -0400, servilio servi...@gmail.com wrote:
What about having Carl do the merging of features into a develop
branch[1], then the release manager prepares a release in a release
branch, merging back and
Fixes broken build on DragonFly BSD
Signed-off-by: Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org
---
lib/Makefile.local |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/Makefile.local b/lib/Makefile.local
index fe42920..88d8deb 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile.local
+++
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:18:17 +0100, Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote:
Fixes broken build on DragonFly BSD
- sed -n 's/^\s*\(notmuch_[a-z_]*\)\s*(.*/\t\1;/p' $ notmuch.sym
+ sed -n 's/^[[:space:]]*\(notmuch_[a-z_]*\)[[:space:]]*(.*/'`printf
\t`'\1;/p' $ notmuch.sym
Fix (for
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:23:02 -0500, Jed Brown j...@59a2.org wrote:
Remind me of why bugfix patches can't (usually) be applied to the
release branch first, then merged into master?
Yes, that might work out for a release consisting of one or two
critical patches, and happening more or less
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 03:14:03 -0400, servilio servi...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there is no need for tags on master, make dist should only
be run on the release branch, right?
It isn't just about make dist (which I anyway thinks makes sense to run
on master to make snapshots). Every
Quoth Pieter Praet on Jul 02 at 4:20 pm:
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:37:11 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/alternative
On Jul 1, 2011 10:55 AM, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Update test_emacs documentation in test/README according to the latest
changes in emacs tests. Move the note regarding setting variables
from test/emacs to test/README.
---
test/README | 10 +++---
test/emacs |5 -
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
Human-friendly scenario:
* open a thread where a message which ends with an HTML part is
followed by another message
* make the first message visible
* goto the beginning of the second message (first line, first colon)
* hit RET
Result: nothing happens except for No URL at point message
Great idea!
Just a heads-up, this will conflict with the first two patches in the
atomicity series (though git may not detect the second conflict).
Both are trivial patches, though, so the merge should be easy.
Three minor comments below.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Dmitry Kurochkin
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 23:42:13 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Great idea!
Just a heads-up, this will conflict with the first two patches in the
atomicity series (though git may not detect the second conflict).
Both are trivial patches, though, so the merge should be easy.
Oh.
This version implements suggestions by Austin.
Regards,
Dmitry
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Update test_emacs documentation in test/README according to the latest
changes in emacs tests. Move the note regarding setting variables
from test/emacs to test/README.
---
test/README | 10 +++---
test/emacs |5 -
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
There is existing support for broken tests. But it is not convenient
to use. The primary issue is that we have to maintain a set of
test_expect_*_failure functions which are equivalent to the normal
test_expect_* counterparts except for what functions are called for
result reporting. The patch
21 matches
Mail list logo
