On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:57:23 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> notmuch new, restore, and tag commands support maildir flag
> synchronization with notmuch tags. Reference the notmuch-config(1) man
> page about it in the relevant man pages.
Pushed
d
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:23:41 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> At the risk of duplication between the man page and the configuration
> file generated by default, document the notmuch configuration options
> in the notmuch config man page.
Pushed.
d
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:50:26 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> The behavior of the header line in show-mode changed from showing the
> subject of the first open message to showing the subject of the first
> message in 4d77f18b. Update a comment to reflect this.
Pushed.
d
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:26:23 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> ---
> devel/schemata | 138
> ++
> notmuch-search.c |3 +
> notmuch-show.c |2 +
Pushed just the first in the series.
d
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:47:52 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> See previous commit.
Pushed.
d
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:47:51 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> ---
> notmuch-config.c |5 -
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
pushed.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:20:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> libgmime-2.6-dev entered debian unstable today. If 2.6 is available,
> notmuch should build against 2.6 instead of 2.4, as 2.6 is the current
> upstream stable version of libgmime.
Pushed.
d
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:16:01 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> ---
> emacs/notmuch-lib.el |9 +
> emacs/notmuch-print.el |8 ++--
> emacs/notmuch-show.el |5 -
> emacs/notmuch.el | 21 +
> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Quoth Mark Walters on Feb 25 at 8:06 am:
>
> Here is the latest version of the series. It fixes all of Austin's
> review comments. I don't think there are any significant outstanding
> issues.
LGTM.
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > > gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > How about if '*'
I'm tring to figure out how to use afew. It looks interesting, but
gives me surprising results.
I did `afew --learn spam -- tag:spam` and believe this tells afew that
all the messages matching tag:spam should be classified as spam. But if
that is right, why would `afew -c spam -- tag:spam` then
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:42:36 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
> you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:
>
> yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel
>
> to get:
>
> $ rpm -q notmuch gmime
>
This was going to stdout. I removed the newline at the beginning of
printing the fatal error message because it wouldn't make sense if you
were only looking at the stderr stream (e.g., you had redirected
stdout to /dev/null).
---
notmuch-new.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
Previously such errors were simply ignored. Now they cause an
immediate cleanup and abort.
---
notmuch-new.c | 24 ++--
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-new.c b/notmuch-new.c
index bd9786a..0cbd479 100644
--- a/notmuch-new.c
+++
Previously, fatal errors in add_files_recursive were not treated as
fatal by its callers (including itself!) and add_files_recursive
sometimes returned errors on non-fatal conditions. This makes
add_files_recursive errors consistently fatal and updates all callers
to treat them as fatal.
---
This series cleans up some bad error handling in notmuch new. In many
cases, fatal errors were being ignored, sometimes blatantly and
sometimes because the caller did not treat them as fatal even if the
callee did.
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:53:27 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:05:44 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
[ ... ]
> >
> > By seeing the thoughts thrown in IRC there seems to be plenty if things
> > to resolve until something like this is going to be available in stock
> > notmuch. In
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:31:39PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken fernseed.info> wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
> > >
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39:38PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
> More information:
>
> https://github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz/wiki
>
> https://raw.github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz/master/README.notmuch
We have mailing list now:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39:38PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
More information:
https://github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz/wiki
https://raw.github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz/master/README.notmuch
We have mailing list now:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:31:39PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken
mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante
peter.a.porta...@gmail.com wrote:
I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:42:36 +0100, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel
to get:
$ rpm -q notmuch gmime
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
Previously, fatal errors in add_files_recursive were not treated as
fatal by its callers (including itself!) and add_files_recursive
sometimes returned errors on non-fatal conditions. This makes
add_files_recursive errors consistently fatal and updates all callers
to treat them as fatal.
---
This series cleans up some bad error handling in notmuch new. In many
cases, fatal errors were being ignored, sometimes blatantly and
sometimes because the caller did not treat them as fatal even if the
callee did.
___
notmuch mailing list
Previously such errors were simply ignored. Now they cause an
immediate cleanup and abort.
---
notmuch-new.c | 24 ++--
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-new.c b/notmuch-new.c
index bd9786a..0cbd479 100644
--- a/notmuch-new.c
+++
This was going to stdout. I removed the newline at the beginning of
printing the fatal error message because it wouldn't make sense if you
were only looking at the stderr stream (e.g., you had redirected
stdout to /dev/null).
---
notmuch-new.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
I'm tring to figure out how to use afew. It looks interesting, but
gives me surprising results.
I did `afew --learn spam -- tag:spam` and believe this tells afew that
all the messages matching tag:spam should be classified as spam. But if
that is right, why would `afew -c spam -- tag:spam` then
Quoth Mark Walters on Feb 25 at 8:06 am:
Here is the latest version of the series. It fixes all of Austin's
review comments. I don't think there are any significant outstanding
issues.
LGTM.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
I would like to thread some mails by subject, can I do this: get to the data
and forge threads between messages that don't otherwise have any References or
In-Reply-To:s?
Basically I want to make mails with Subject: XYZZY Re: foobar replies to
those without Re:.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:16:01 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
---
emacs/notmuch-lib.el |9 +
emacs/notmuch-print.el |8 ++--
emacs/notmuch-show.el |5 -
emacs/notmuch.el | 21 +
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:20:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
libgmime-2.6-dev entered debian unstable today. If 2.6 is available,
notmuch should build against 2.6 instead of 2.4, as 2.6 is the current
upstream stable version of libgmime.
Pushed.
d
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:47:51 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
---
notmuch-config.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
pushed.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:47:52 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
See previous commit.
Pushed.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:26:23 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
---
devel/schemata | 138
++
notmuch-search.c |3 +
notmuch-show.c |2 +
Pushed just the first in the series.
d
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:50:26 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
The behavior of the header line in show-mode changed from showing the
subject of the first open message to showing the subject of the first
message in 4d77f18b. Update a comment to reflect this.
Pushed.
d
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:23:41 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
At the risk of duplication between the man page and the configuration
file generated by default, document the notmuch configuration options
in the notmuch config man page.
Pushed.
d
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:57:23 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
notmuch new, restore, and tag commands support maildir flag
synchronization with notmuch tags. Reference the notmuch-config(1) man
page about it in the relevant man pages.
Pushed
d
38 matches
Mail list logo
