[PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

2012-06-27 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote: > > Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding > > of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients). > > > > Then, before release 0.12 the emacs

[PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

2012-06-27 Thread Daniel Schoepe
point is not _that_ subjective, I hope. Cheers, Daniel -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120627/e44dd922/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

2012-06-27 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
the release, so I'm perfectly happy to change back. jamie. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120627/057abcdc/attachment.pgp>

[RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs

2012-06-27 Thread Mark Walters
Hi On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Ethan Glasser-Camp wrote: > Hi guys, > > Sorry for dropping off the mailing list after I sent my last patch > series (http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/009470.html). I > haven't had the time or a stable enough email address to really follow > notmuch

[PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

2012-06-27 Thread Carl Worth
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients). Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new reply-to-sender only feature. In commit f02b475fa781bb5df3358c73213e7633a99f016e the new feature was

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs

2012-06-27 Thread Mark Walters
Hi On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Ethan Glasser-Camp ethan.glasser.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, Sorry for dropping off the mailing list after I sent my last patch series (http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/009470.html). I haven't had the time or a stable enough email address to really

[PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

2012-06-27 Thread Carl Worth
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients). Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new reply-to-sender only feature. In commit f02b475fa781bb5df3358c73213e7633a99f016e the new feature was

Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

2012-06-27 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients). Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new reply-to-sender only feature. In commit

Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

2012-06-27 Thread Daniel Schoepe
On Wed, 27.06.2012 19:55, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: I actually rebound these keys immediately after the release, so I'm perfectly happy to change back. Same here. I think the ratio of cases where I wanted to reply to all participants instead compared to just to the sender is something like

Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)

2012-06-27 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).