Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> The code LGTM. Is there any quoting differences between these 2
> tagging methods ?
>
That's a good point. I added quoting easily enough, but as soon as I
did, I discovered the rest of nmbug has some issues with tags with
spaces in them. I'll see how hard this is to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:09:22 +0100, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
>> I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the
>> headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)
>> satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like
>> headers:"List-Id:
Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20130213/322273b2/attachment.pgp>
[ please keep the notmuch@ list in Cc:, so that others could help and/or
benefit from the solution ... when we find one :-) ]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:51:05PM +0100, Profpatsch wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but I still don't get it. What do you mean with "no mail"?
>
> Haha, sorry, that was
On Sat, Feb 09 2013, david at tethera.net wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> In the case of large changes to the database from git, one of main
> current bottlenecks is the large number of execs of notmuch tag. This
> avoids that by using use the batch tagging facilities as of notmuch
> 0.15.
>
>
Using char instead of int allows for simpler definitions of the
DOCIDSET macros so the code is easier to understand and consistent with
respect to memory-usage. Estimated reduction of memory-usage for
bitmap about 8 times.
---
Re-submission for comment-reasons.
---
---
lib/query.cc | 10
Somehow my comments don't get through... I'll try it another way.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Robert Mast [mailto:beheerder at tekenbeetziekten.nl]
Verzonden: woensdag 13 februari 2013 16:12
Aan: notmuch at notmuchmail.org
CC: Robert Mast
Onderwerp: [english 100%] [PATCH]
diff --git a/lib/query.cc b/lib/query.cc
index e9c1a2d..7381a54 100644
--- a/lib/query.cc
+++ b/lib/query.cc
@@ -39,12 +39,12 @@ typedef struct _notmuch_mset_messages {
} notmuch_mset_messages_t;
struct _notmuch_doc_id_set {
-unsigned int *bitmap;
+unsigned char *bitmap;
unsigned
pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20130213/49002523/attachment.pgp>
.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20130213/e291e6a3/attachment.pgp>
ble
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20130213/449919f3/attachment.pgp>
I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the
headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)
satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like
headers:"List-Id: blah" or similar.
It is not as nice as individually indexed headers, but it
> Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
>
>> But don't get me wrong, the CLI is one of the things that makes notmuch
>> so incredibly awesome. It's an email swiss army knife that's there when
>> you need it. But given that even I often need to look at the man page
>> during my occasional CLI usage, I
On Sat, Feb 09 2013, da...@tethera.net wrote:
From: David Bremner brem...@debian.org
In the case of large changes to the database from git, one of main
current bottlenecks is the large number of execs of notmuch tag. This
avoids that by using use the batch tagging facilities as of notmuch
diff --git a/lib/query.cc b/lib/query.cc
index e9c1a2d..7381a54 100644
--- a/lib/query.cc
+++ b/lib/query.cc
@@ -39,12 +39,12 @@ typedef struct _notmuch_mset_messages {
} notmuch_mset_messages_t;
struct _notmuch_doc_id_set {
-unsigned int *bitmap;
+unsigned char *bitmap;
unsigned
On Tue, Feb 12 2013, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the
headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)
satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like
headers:List-Id: blah or
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:09:22 +0100, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I think I mentioned this on irc sometime ago: would indexing all the
headers as a separate free text entry (under headers: for example)
satisfy most of this. So then you could search for things like
Profpatsch wrote:
Since I don’t get your bug tracking system (d’oh ;), here is a bug I
encountered with notmuch-mutt using this macro I guess was from the
“official” tutorial:
# Construct a thread ouf of the marked mail (or something like that,
# doesn’t work atm (errors out))
macro
Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes:
The code LGTM. Is there any quoting differences between these 2
tagging methods ?
That's a good point. I added quoting easily enough, but as soon as I
did, I discovered the rest of nmbug has some issues with tags with
spaces in them. I'll see how hard
On 13-02-13 02:35pm, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
A more likely idea is to check whether you have $pipe_decode set.
If you have this set, you need to make sure you are not weeding out
message-id with 'ignore'.
In fact, I've just tried this, and I can replicate the problem and exact
error
20 matches
Mail list logo
