[PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-01-30 Thread Mark Walters
Dear Jani > That is the unicorn... many of the query improvements I have in mind > depend on a custom query parser. So I'd like to have that. And a > pony. But in the mean time, I'm left wondering whether I should pursue > folder: as a boolean prefix, or try to figure out if there are >

[PATCH] ruby bindings message: docstring typo

2014-01-30 Thread Gaute Hope
c Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140130/1884026d/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-01-30 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 25 at 5:38 pm: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Perhaps we need to have two prefixes, one of which is the literal > > filesystem folder and another which hides the implementation details, > > like I mentioned in my mail to Peter [1]. But consider this: my

[PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-01-30 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Carl Worth wrote: > Austin Clements writes: >> I think you're assuming we have much more control over this than we >> do. > > To be fair, I only started discussing my proposal for '^' and '$' in > response to Jani's proposal with special semantics for trailing '/' and >

[PATCH] ruby bindings message: docstring typo

2014-01-30 Thread Gaute Hope
--- bindings/ruby/message.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bindings/ruby/message.c b/bindings/ruby/message.c index eed4b31..4ff6097 100644 --- a/bindings/ruby/message.c +++ b/bindings/ruby/message.c @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ notmuch_rb_message_get_filename (VALUE

Re: [PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-01-30 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Jani Nikula on Jan 25 at 5:38 pm: On Sat, 25 Jan 2014, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote: Perhaps we need to have two prefixes, one of which is the literal filesystem folder and another which hides the implementation details, like I mentioned in my mail to Peter [1]. But consider