On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>>> distressing. Ugh.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am not quite sure
Hi
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>>> distressing. Ugh.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am not quite
Jani Nikula writes:
> It's not going to help you, but I'll mention a few of the issues the old
> folder: search had, which we also had complaints about, and which would
> have been quite hard to fix while preserving the behaviour you want. In
> short, we considered the old folder: search broken.
This adds the current query as a "default value" to
notmuch-read-qeury. The default value is available via a down-arrow as
opposed to history which is available from the up arrow.
Note if a user presses return in the minibuffer this value is not
returned.
The implementation is simple but
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
>> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:57:49PM -0700, dm-list-email-notmuch at
scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>
> Worse, because of my poor performance, I was hoping to segregate
> messages by year. So it would be:
>
> 2013/.mail.class
> 2013/.mail.voicemail
> 2014/.mail.class
> 2014/.mail.voicemail
>
>
Hello David,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:16:07PM -0700, David Mazieres expires 2014-07-31 PDT
wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
> >
> > Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
> > update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
> > not work
Jani Nikula writes:
> Sort the file while at it.
pushed to master.
d
Jani Nikula writes:
> Wildcard matching was a feature of the probabilistic prefix, and we no
> longer have it for the boolean prefix. Also note that top-level folder
> can now be searched.
pushed to release.
d
On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
> (bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
> new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
> organize my mail.
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
my database.path I have a bunch of mail in
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes:
As far as updating the test suite, etc., it's almost certain that the
core notmuch developers would be unsatisfied with whatever I've done,
since the code base is very clean and has a
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
match just the mail.class part without the year? How very
distressing. Ugh.
Hi
I am not quite sure what you are meaning by hierarchically group
messages. Searching for
This adds the current query as a default value to
notmuch-read-qeury. The default value is available via a down-arrow as
opposed to history which is available from the up arrow.
Note if a user presses return in the minibuffer this value is not
returned.
The implementation is simple but
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
match just the mail.class part without the year? How very
distressing. Ugh.
Hi
I am not quite sure
Hi
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
match just the mail.class part without the year? How very
distressing. Ugh.
Hi
I am not quite
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
A few trivial updates, and an important fix.
Changes since v1: improved commit messages.
I have pushed these to release and master.
d
pgpFeATpEBPAw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes:
We've had a quiet freeze for a week or so, so I think we're probably
ready to release. Per Jani's suggestion, I made a tl;dr summary for
the NEWS. Barring last minute bugs, I'd like to release this weekend,
so please send me any NEWS comments ASAP.
d
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
It's not going to help you, but I'll mention a few of the issues the old
folder: search had, which we also had complaints about, and which would
have been quite hard to fix while preserving the behaviour you want. In
short, we considered the old folder:
19 matches
Mail list logo
