Re: [PATCH] Add option `hooks.path` for setting the directory of hooks.

On Sat, Aug 27 2016, Erik Rybakken wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks Tomi and David for the feedback! > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:32:19PM +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: > >> ... but I can think of one problem there (if my memory server correctly) > > Yeah, I didn't think of that.

Re: Query operators

Yuri D'Elia writes: > > What's your POV on this? Is it expected/useful in some scenario? > > I'd expect all terms to follow the same rules for consistency. For terms where each document (mail message) has only one term with a given prefix, OR is a more natural default, since

Re: Query operators

On Mon, Aug 29 2016, David Bremner wrote: > Yuri D'Elia writes: > >> term1 AND (tag:term2 OR tag:term3) >> >> am I right? Is this a feature of the xapian query syntax? (can it be >> tweaked to _unconditionally_ AND all terms?) > > This is most likely a

Re: Query operators

Yuri D'Elia writes: > term1 AND (tag:term2 OR tag:term3) > > am I right? Is this a feature of the xapian query syntax? (can it be > tweaked to _unconditionally_ AND all terms?) This is most likely a feature of the "grouping" parameter in QueryParser::add_boolean_prefix. It

Re: Query operators

On Mon, Aug 29 2016, Charlie Allom wrote: > You can debug what the real query is by adding NOTMUCH_DEBUG_QUERY=1 to > your search: > > 12:29 YELP-CHARLIE~[local@2.7.12] % NOTMUCH_DEBUG_QUERY=1 notmuch search > 'term1 (tag:term2 tag:term3)' > Query string is: >

Re: Query operators

You can debug what the real query is by adding NOTMUCH_DEBUG_QUERY=1 to your search: 12:29 YELP-CHARLIE~[local@2.7.12] % NOTMUCH_DEBUG_QUERY=1 notmuch search 'term1 (tag:term2 tag:term3)' Query string is: term1 (tag:term2 tag:term3) Exclude query is: Xapian::Query((Kdeleted OR Kspam OR

Query operators

Hi everyone, I'm a bit baffled by the query syntax. Reading the manual: ``Each term in the query will be implicitly connected by a logical AND if no explicit operator is provided (except that terms with a common prefix will be implicitly combined with OR).'' I would have assumed that: term1