Franz Fellner writes:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:20:52 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> Lucas Hoffmann writes:
>>
>> > Thank you Franz, sadly your reply did not convince me:
>> >
>> > Quoting Franz Fellner (2016-08-31 11:21:18)
>> >> Your problem: the example sucks ;)
>> >
>> > No, I must object :
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:20:52 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Lucas Hoffmann writes:
>
> > Thank you Franz, sadly your reply did not convince me:
> >
> > Quoting Franz Fellner (2016-08-31 11:21:18)
> >> Your problem: the example sucks ;)
> >
> > No, I must object :(
> >
> >> If the query searches f
Lucas Hoffmann writes:
> Thank you Franz, sadly your reply did not convince me:
>
> Quoting Franz Fellner (2016-08-31 11:21:18)
>> Your problem: the example sucks ;)
>
> No, I must object :(
>
>> If the query searches for a tag you also have in exclude_tags (in your
>> case: spam) the exclude get
Thank you Franz, sadly your reply did not convince me:
Quoting Franz Fellner (2016-08-31 11:21:18)
> Your problem: the example sucks ;)
No, I must object :(
> If the query searches for a tag you also have in exclude_tags (in your
> case: spam) the exclude gets ignored.
Is that documented? Beca
Your problem: the example sucks ;)
If the query searches for a tag you also have in exclude_tags (in your case:
spam) the exclude gets ignored.
Change your query to just "is:inbox" and magically "spam" really gets excluded.
However it is better to create fresh query objects for each new query. I
Dear list members,
I think I found a bug or at least undocumented behaviour in the notmuch
library. I would like to report this here. Originally I found the bug
in the python library but I attached a c program that shows the same
behaviour. I am running notmuch version 0.22.1 from the Arch Linu
