Re: bug present without emacs25 or notmuch

2016-09-08 Thread David Bremner
David Bremner writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > > I have managed to duplicate (I think) this bug without notmuch or emacs > 25. > > In emacs 24.5.1 (on debian) Sorry, don't reply to that bugs.debian.org address. d ___ notmuch mailing list notmu

bug present without emacs25 or notmuch

2016-09-08 Thread David Bremner
I have managed to duplicate (I think) this bug without notmuch or emacs 25. In emacs 24.5.1 (on debian) (require 'mml2015) (setq mml2015-sign-with-sender t) M-x toggle-debug-on-error M-x message-mail (fill in some headers, From: me) C-c C-m C-s C-c C-c yields the following backtrace Debugger

bug present without emacs25 or notmuch

2016-09-08 Thread David Bremner
I have managed to duplicate (I think) this bug without notmuch or emacs 25. In emacs 24.5.1 (on debian) (require 'mml2015) (setq mml2015-sign-with-sender t) M-x toggle-debug-on-error M-x message-mail (fill in some headers, From: me) C-c C-m C-s C-c C-c yields the following backtrace Debugger

Re: [PATCH] test/crypto: hard code fingerprint

2016-09-08 Thread David Bremner
David Bremner writes: > Originally the intent was to make the test more robust against changing > test keys. It turns out that (unscientifically) gpg --with-colons output > changes more often than our test key. Rather than making the script more > complex, just hard code the fingerprint. pushed

notmuch release 0.22.2 now available

2016-09-08 Thread David Bremner
Where to obtain notmuch 0.22.2 === http://notmuchmail.org/releases/notmuch-0.22.2.tar.gz Which can be verified with: http://notmuchmail.org/releases/notmuch-0.22.2.tar.gz.sha1 f60825656b0d00a6a60f82a01ab687f5bb46e839 notmuch-0.22.2.tar.gz http://notmuchmail.org/

Re: [PATCH] test/crypto: hard code fingerprint

2016-09-08 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Thu, Sep 08 2016, David Bremner wrote: > Originally the intent was to make the test more robust against changing > test keys. It turns out that (unscientifically) gpg --with-colons output > changes more often than our test key. Rather than making the script more > complex, just hard code the f

[PATCH] test/crypto: hard code fingerprint

2016-09-08 Thread David Bremner
Originally the intent was to make the test more robust against changing test keys. It turns out that (unscientifically) gpg --with-colons output changes more often than our test key. Rather than making the script more complex, just hard code the fingerprint. This fixes Debian bug #847013; I expect