Jani Nikula writes:
> The notmuch message is no longer needed. Simplify.
LGTM. I guess the comment I asked for in the last patch can be something
like "unused parameter will be fixed in the next commit"
d
___
notmuch mailing list
Jani Nikula writes:
> Improves the accuracy in many ways.
Essentially same objections as the last patch
If the unused parameter to get_sender is intentional, that probably
needs a remark as well
___
notmuch mailing list
Jani Nikula writes:
> ---
> notmuch-reply.c | 20
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
The commit message needs a bit more explanation. I think the writer
knows this code too well ;).
- This changes the arguments of reply_to_header_is
Jani Nikula writes:
> Pass in GMimeMessage to simplify To/Cc/Bcc headers. We'll eventually
> remove the notmuch message passing altogether, but keep both for now
> to not make too big changes at once.
Patches 9-11 LGTM.
d
___
notmuch
Jani Nikula writes:
>
> +test_begin_subtest "Reply to a message with multiple Cc headers"
> +test_subtest_known_broken
> +cat > "${MAIL_DIR}"/broken_cc < +From: Alice
> +To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> +Cc: Bob
>
Jani Nikula writes:
> Now that we've made the various reply formats quite similar to each
> other, there's no point in keeping the abstractions. They are now
> close enough to be put in one function.
>
> For now, a mime node will be uselessly created for the headers-only
> case,
Jani Nikula writes:
> Just use strdup when original references is not available, instead of
> trying to cram everything into a monster asprintf. There should be no
> functional changes.
> ---
> notmuch-reply.c | 13 ++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7
Jani Nikula writes:
> Again, in preparation for later unification, reorganize
> create_reply_message() to be more similar to the open coded version in
> the headers-only format reply code. Due to "pretty" header ordering,
> there should be no change in output. There should be no
David Bremner writes:
> Steven Allen writes:
>
>> This sets up and runs all the correct hooks and reduces some redundancy.
>
> pushed to master
Thanks!
--
Steven Allen
((Do Not Email ))
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Steven Allen writes:
> This sets up and runs all the correct hooks and reduces some redundancy.
pushed to master
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
The current notmuch-show-message-adjust logic only adjusts the buffer
focused in the current window. Extend it to adjust any kind of buffer,
even buffers in a window without focus or in a different frame or even
not shown at all.
This new logic is very useful to build upon for the auto-refresh
There's no reason to completely kill a buffer while refreshing its
search results because its buffer name is constant between refreshes
(based on the search query) and only its contents may change.
Reusing the same buffer also makes it possible to do things like
refreshing a buffer which is not
This patch series adds a function to refresh all buffers, including an
option to silently refresh them in the background i.e. to not show the
newly refreshed buffer in any window.
This is very useful for asynchronously updating all buffers when new
mail arrives, using logic similar to the
Add an optional no-display arg to the generic buffer refresh function,
notmuch-refresh-this-buffer, which works the same way as notmuch-hello
mode's notmuch-hello-update no-display arg.
The idea is for the generic notmuch-refresh-this-buffer to pass down
this arg to the "mode-specific" refresh
This new notmuch-refresh-all-buffers function calls each buffer's major
mode specific refresh function using the generic function
notmuch-refresh-this-buffer.
It is very useful because by passing a non-nil arg to the buffer specific
refresh functions it refreshes all notmuch buffers in the
On Sat, Sep 10 2016, Steven Allen wrote:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
>
> David Bremner writes:
>> Steven Allen writes:
>>
>>> This sets up and runs all the correct hooks and reduces some redundancy.
>>> ---
>>
>> The idea seems
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
>> Prepare for further future unification by making the code similar. The
>> only functional change is that errors in mime_node_open() also break
>> execution in default reply format.
>
>>
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, David Bremner wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
>> -if (mime_node_open (ctx, message, &(params->crypto), ) ==
>> NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
>> -format_part_reply (root);
>> -talloc_free (root);
>> -}
>> +
18 matches
Mail list logo