Re: pytest integration for the notmuch test suite

Floris Bruynooghe writes: > On Sun, Mar 25 2018, David Bremner wrote: > >> Here's one approach. A given pytest "file" can be embedded in a normal >> (for us) test script. As I write this, it occurs to me you might be >> thinking of embedding unit tests in the bindings source

Re: pytest integration for the notmuch test suite

On Sun, Mar 25 2018, David Bremner wrote: > Here's one approach. A given pytest "file" can be embedded in a normal > (for us) test script. As I write this, it occurs to me you might be > thinking of embedding unit tests in the bindings source files; that > would be easy to add, something along

Re: [PATCH 1/3] configure: check for pytest binary

On Sun, Mar 25 2018, David Bremner wrote: > This is to support future use of pytest in the test suite Thanks for having a go at this! > --- > configure | 24 > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/configure b/configure > index b177b141..ab45878d 100755 >

Re: New Python bindings (was: Crash with Python bindings)

On Wed, Mar 21 2018, Justus Winter wrote: > > Floris Bruynooghe writes: > >> This is exactly what I have fixed in my alternative bindings which I >> created around the end of last year [0]. So we do have an idea of how >> to fix this, at the time I said I do believe that it's

Re: pytest integration for the notmuch test suite

Tomi Ollila writes: > On Sun, Mar 25 2018, David Bremner wrote: > >> Here's one approach. A given pytest "file" can be embedded in a normal >> (for us) test script. As I write this, it occurs to me you might be >> thinking of embedding unit tests in the bindings source