Floris Bruynooghe writes:
>> As I mentioned last time this was discussed, the python bindings are
>> currently more or less a core part of notmuch as both the test
>> suite and developement need them.
>
> Sure, I think pypi publishing is orthogonal to this however. Either or
> both versions of t
On Fri 16 Nov 2018 at 07:15 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Fri 2018-11-16 06:27:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>> Floris Bruynooghe writes:
>>
>>> These are at https://github.com/flub/notmuch/tree/cffi/bindings/python-cffi
>>>
>>> I'm not really convinced of the way forward last time it w
On Fri 16 Nov 2018 at 06:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> Brian May writes:
>
>> Floris Bruynooghe writes:
>>
>>> I've since wondered if just getting them standalone on pypi is perhaps a
>>> useful service in the mean time as it's relatively little effort. And
>>> if there eventually is a desir
On Fri 2018-11-16 06:27:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> Floris Bruynooghe writes:
>
>> These are at https://github.com/flub/notmuch/tree/cffi/bindings/python-cffi
>>
>> I'm not really convinced of the way forward last time it was discussed
>> on how to get them merged into notmuch itself so have
Brian May writes:
> Floris Bruynooghe writes:
>
>> I've since wondered if just getting them standalone on pypi is perhaps a
>> useful service in the mean time as it's relatively little effort. And
>> if there eventually is a desire again to get them merged in some way
>> that could still be don
Floris Bruynooghe writes:
>
> These are at https://github.com/flub/notmuch/tree/cffi/bindings/python-cffi
>
> I'm not really convinced of the way forward last time it was discussed
> on how to get them merged into notmuch itself so have failed to put in
> the not insignificant effort.
>
> I've si
