On Sat, Mar 23 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Tue 2019-03-19 07:08:19 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> This produces tarballs that are roughly 30% smaller.
>
> LGTM. I can confirm that i'm seeing tarball sizes go from 924543 bytes
> (or 917179 bytes with gzip -9) to 644892 bytes with this
On Wednesday, 2019-04-10 at 15:27:14 +02, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> David Edmondson writes:
>
>> Yes. My argument was not that we shouldn't have this, just that I wonder
>> if it results in a good workflow for people who are not using
>> notmuch/mu4e/gmail (or any other client that shares the
On Wednesday, 2019-04-10 at 12:35:37 +02, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Ping! :)
> Anyone?
Nothing currently available does it.
You might be able to avoid mm altogether and go direct to notmuch to
save the parts, which might make things a bit easier to control from the
front end.
Iterate over the
Add test of forwarding messages from within emacs.
The first test checks that a references header is properly
added to the new message. The second test checks that the
send-hook of the forwarding message adds a forwarded-tag
to the original message.
---
test/T730-emacs-forwarding.sh | 30
Based on the feedback from Tomi and David (thanks!), here is a
updated and cleaner version of the test associated with the
patch-set for forwarding.
Örjan Ekeberg (4):
emacs: Add References header to forwarded messages
emacs: Use a buffer-local variable to update tags when sending replies
