On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 12:47 AM Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> We can replace the Foo object any other kind of Enumerable, and the
> code works just the same:
>
> foo = %w[inbox unread]
I realized this might be too idiomatic of Ruby, it's the same thing as:
foo = [ 'inbox', 'unread' ]
>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:13 PM David Bremner wrote:
>
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> > We don't need a FileNames enumerable object only for a small number of
> > strings,
> > we can just get them directly.
> >
> > This iterator is meant to be transient and works only once, so we better
> >
