Kevin Boulain writes:
> +
> +inline Xapian::Query
> +_sexp_initial_query (_sexp_initial_t initial)
My first thought was that this should be static, but maybe it doesn't
matter in C++; I see the other inline functions in that file are not
declared static.
> +}
> +assert (!
Kevin Boulain writes:
> The test fails quite reliably for me:
> T810-tsan: Testing run code with TSan enabled against the library
>PASS create
>PASS query
>FAIL sexp query
I can't get this test to fail at all. I'm not sure what to conclude from
that. This is on a 20 core
Andy Smith writes:
>
> What this means is that I see a message that looks like this:
>
> From: Joe Bloggs via somelist
> Message-ID:
> Subject: Joe's original subject
> References: (from Joe's post)
> In-Reply-To: (from Joe's post)
>
> That then contains a message/rfc822
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
> ---
> emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 22 +++---
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
> index 3235f555..f245a7dd 100644
> --- a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
> +++
According to the now deleted commentary, the hack of using run-at-time
was needed for Emacs 24. It seems to be no longer needed for Emacs
28.2, and removing it makes further changes to the code simpler.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 6 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
I would
Tomi Ollila writes:
>> fi
>>
>> +if [ -n "${LD_PRELOAD-}" ]; then
>
> Is it problem to chain LD_PRELOADs here ? I see later in this message
> there is LD_PRELOAD's concatenated with :'s (in case non-empty) ?
>
It is not a problem in general, but ASAN insists on being first in
LD_PRELOAD, so
David Bremner writes:
> This obsoletes the series at id:20230409142627.2216080-1-da...@tethera.net.
>
I have applied this series (with some fixes from Tomi) to master.
d
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Tomi Ollila writes:
>> -LD_PRELOAD=${LD_PRELOAD:+:$LD_PRELOAD}:./${shim_file} notmuch-shared
>> "$@"
>> +LD_PRELOAD=${LD_PRELOAD:+:$LD_PRELOAD}:./${shim_file} $notmuch_cmd "$@"
>
> hmm, should the "chaining" be done on other order (i.e. the shim_file
> before anything if there... (that
On Thu, Jul 20 2023, David Bremner wrote:
> Thanks to discussion with Olly Betts and some perf runs, I realized
> the current clean up of deleted files from the database is somewhat
> wasteful since it modifies the message documents (by deleting the
> filename) before in most cases deleting the
