On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:06:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:31:36 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:38 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > > Message mode uses a different name for composition
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:38 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Message mode uses a different name for composition buffers in newer
> versions of emacs. Allow for this when causing the composition window
> to overlay the viewing window.
> ---
>
> I don't understand why Aneesh chose to use
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:38 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Message mode uses a different name for composition buffers in newer
versions of emacs. Allow for this when causing the composition window
to overlay the viewing window.
---
I don't understand why Aneesh chose to use
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:06:40 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 21:31:36 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:51:38 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Message mode uses a different name for composition
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:28:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:56:57 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> >
> > When you have long thread, it would be nice to be able to
> > show the message to which the current message is a
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:28:40 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:56:57 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@gmail.com
When you have long thread, it would be nice to be able to
show the message
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:37:11 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> I pushed hard to get most everything we wanted for 0.3 done yesterday,
> (which was one week since 0.2). I think we're still within the tolerance
> of my published "about a week" schedule, but I would like to wrap things
> up soon.
>
> Here
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo fcarr...@yahoo.com.br
wrote:
David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
message. That was not
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
I found another issue. In the notmuch-show-mode "RET" key on from and
subject doesn't seem to work.
For ex: for the last message "RET" key on from doesn't fold the message.
For all the message "RET" key on subject doesn't show the
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:14:09 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the inline patches shown similar to
> > diff-mode not just the attached patches ?
>
>
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
I found another issue. In the notmuch-show-mode RET key on from and
subject doesn't seem to work.
For ex: for the last message RET key on from doesn't fold the message.
For all the message RET key on subject doesn't show the
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:32:41 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I've pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository
> > at http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
> >
> > This is intended to be
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:14:09 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Is there a way to get the inline patches shown similar to
diff-mode not just the attached patches ?
A new hook function
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:32:41 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
I've pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository
at http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the master branch).
This is
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT), Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:08:47 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> > For the issue of a background task interfering with interactive use, the
> > feel
> > arguably matters more than the throughput.
> >
> > I'll probably put that patch in
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT), Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:08:47 +, Olly Betts o...@survex.com wrote:
For the issue of a background task interfering with interactive use, the
feel
arguably matters more than the throughput.
I'll
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:11:46 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
>
> This patch helps in customizing search result display
> similar to mutt's index_format. The customization is done
> by defining an alist as below
>
> (setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ")
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:07:26 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Arbitrary font faces can be specified for given thread tags. By
> default, no coloring is applied. To specify coloring, place something
> like this in your .emacs:
>
> (setq notmuch-search-line-faces '(("delete" . '(:foreground
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:19:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
>
> This patch helps in customizing search result display
> similar to mutt's index_format. The customization is done
> by defining an alist as below
>
> (setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ")
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:07:54 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:16:44 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> >
> > This patch add --format=sender-only option.
>
> I like the idea here, (and agree that an 'R' keybinding would be great).
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:07:54 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:16:44 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@gmail.com
This patch add --format=sender-only option.
I like the idea here, (and
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:58:38 +0200, Baruch Even wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added a quick hack to show a message thread in notmuch-gtk and this
> makes it semi-usable. I don't actually parse the reply of notmuch-show
> but it's already passably usable to read mail.
>
While discussing notmuch with
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I just pushed out a nice set of changes to the emacs interface. Here's a
> quick summary of what you can expect to get when you next update:
>
> * Much nicer looking presentation, (no more ugly reverse-video or
> underlines on the
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
.
>
> * The magic space bar is too magic. Threads are separate conversations
> so one key for paging through the current conversation shouldn't
> also switch to the next conversation, (particularly when the
> complementary
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:15:07 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
.
* The magic space bar is too magic. Threads are separate conversations
so one key for paging through the current conversation shouldn't
also switch to the next conversation, (particularly when the
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:50:39 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Remove the underline of both message summary and subject lines.
> Message summary still defaults to reverse-video, use customize to
> change it to whatever you like.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan-Ru Chen
> ---
> notmuch.el | 20
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:01:32 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I know it's a hairy problem, but has anyone started
> > looking into OpenPGP support for notmuch?
>
> Hey, folks. I wanted to try to follow
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:24:07 -0800, Alexander Botero-Lowry wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:28:00 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > This add two faces, notmuch-show-subject-face and
> > notmuch-tag-face. The first face is used to show the subject
> > line in the
29 matches
Mail list logo
