Re: T070 tests portability

2016-01-06 Thread J Farkas
On 2016-01-05 at 17:41:06, David Bremner wrote: > Tomi Ollila writes: > > > The page https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Returning.html > > talks something about gdb not knowing the return type if function > > was compiled without debug info... well, is this is the

T070 tests portability

2016-01-05 Thread J Farkas
I'm in the process of writing insert tests, but it looks like my environment is somewhat older than what the current tests are running on. The following two trivial changes for the original tests make those pass cleanly: The wc I have from GNU textutils 2.0.22 seems to produce extra whitespace

Re: [PATCH] cli/insert: do not lose the SMTP envelope

2016-01-03 Thread J Farkas
On 2016-01-03 at 18:04:39, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jan 2016, J Farkas <jf.hyqohaczlksw4tx...@l2015aftruuq.dns007.net> > wrote: > > From: Janos Farkas <chexum+...@gmail.com> > > Subject: [PATCH] cli/insert: do not lose the SMTP envelope > > > &

Re: cli/insert: do not lose the SMTP envelope

2016-01-02 Thread J Farkas
On 2016-01-02 at 13:28:02, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01 2016, J Farkas <jf.hyqohaczlksw4tx...@l2015aftruuq.dns007.net> > wrote: > > Make sure we store the envelope sender/recipient if provided by > > qmail-command(8) in $RPLINE and $DTLINE. > > --- >

[PATCH] cli/insert: do not lose the SMTP envelope

2016-01-01 Thread J Farkas
From: Janos Farkas Subject: [PATCH] cli/insert: do not lose the SMTP envelope Make sure we store the envelope sender/recipient if provided by qmail-command(8) in $RPLINE and $DTLINE. --- I just realised that the messages delivered directly into maildir don't have the usual