Hi,
El lun. 17 de jun. 2024, David escribió:
>
>> From: Michael J Gruber
>>
>> 37c022ae ("Use `without-restriction` in
>> `with-temporary-notmuch-message-buffer`", 2024-03-14)
>> introduced `delete-line` in a test, but this is Emacs 29 and above only.
>> Replace it with its (almost) definition.
Hi,
El lun. 17 de jun. 2024, Marc escribió:
>
> El lun. 17 de jun. 2024, Michael escribió:
>>> (...)
>>
>> Does this depend on emacs version by any chance, i.e. is
>> `without-restriction` defined on all emacsen? In Fedora's copr
>> infrastructure, all builds succeed but some tests fail with
>> `S
Hi,
El lun. 17 de jun. 2024, Michael escribió:
>> (...)
>
> Does this depend on emacs version by any chance, i.e. is
> `without-restriction` defined on all emacsen? In Fedora's copr
> infrastructure, all builds succeed but some tests fail with
> `Symbol'€™s function definition is void: without-res
Hi there,
> I might be wrong, but I don't think the Gnus agent can be easily reused
> from notmuch. We could perhaps save the message as a draft upon C-c C-j,
> and then have a periodic timer that checks if any of the drafts has
> expired (maybe using a special, additional tag for the search) and
Hi all,
El dom. 24 de mar. 2024, Marc escribió:
> I am attaching a new patch that includes an additional test on
> T630-emacs-draft.sh.
>
> On the test only `References` is at the top (hence hidden by emacs), not
> `In-Reply-To`. I guess that does rely on some configuration.
>
> In any case, the t
Hi there,
> I might be wrong, but I don't think the Gnus agent can be easily reused
> from notmuch. We could perhaps save the message as a draft upon C-c C-j,
> and then have a periodic timer that checks if any of the drafts has
> expired (maybe using a special, additional tag for the search) and
), not
`In-Reply-To`. I guess that does rely on some configuration.
In any case, the test reproduces the problem (lost headers on draft
save), and the patch fixes it!
Hope all is good!! :D
marc
>From 77e8a775571458962ff11af549d1a0428a17435e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Fargas
Date:
consider the one attached
here. Hope I did the "format-patch" thing properly.
I had to move the `without-restriction` call to the top of the
`with-temporary-notmuch-message-buffer` defmacro. It does work properly
now.
marc
>From 48efd572e6b8e6d214fc8b4e7b28f001fc13345a Mon Sep 17 00:00:
and
apologies).
>From 48efd572e6b8e6d214fc8b4e7b28f001fc13345a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Fargas
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:56:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Use `without-restriction` in
`with-temporary-notmuch-message-buffer`
This ensures that the temporary copy of the current message-mode
buffer
Hi,
I hope my previous e-mails was properly sent.
I have been testing the patch and.. does it work? The code looks proper
to me but testing on my computer it is not working properly, as if the
`without-restrictions` was being ignored.
I think I do not understand `defmacro` properly to see where
This ensures that the temporary copy of the current message-mode
buffer is whole and not limited by a current restriction.
An example of such restriction is the default one established by
message-mode when composing a reply, that hides the References,
In-Reply-To and similar headers.
---
emacs/no
Hi there,
I'm not sure if this is the appropiate mailing list for bugs regarding
notmuch.el (Notmuch in Emacs). Also, I'm not subscribed so please keep
me in CC!
I recently noticed that when saving drafts in notmuch I would loose all
the headers that are not normally visible on the compose
buffer
12 matches
Mail list logo
