search order

David Bremner writes: > Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan writes: > >> >> If I startup notmuch and then do a M-x notmuch-search and then *, I see >> the messages with the newest on the top. But if I instead, startup >> notmuch and then hit "s", I see th

Re: search order

David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan r...@rkrishnan.org writes: If I startup notmuch and then do a M-x notmuch-search and then *, I see the messages with the newest on the top. But if I instead, startup notmuch and then hit s, I see that the new messages

unread message appear `folded'

Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan writes: > Hi, > > Pardon me for using non-standard terms here because of lack of knowledge > of the language used in the email world. > > I have this thread in which some messages are tagged unread. When the > thread is opened, I see that

unread message appear `folded'

Hi, Pardon me for using non-standard terms here because of lack of knowledge of the language used in the email world. I have this thread in which some messages are tagged unread. When the thread is opened, I see that those unread messages are not shown in full in the threaded view. Instead they

search order

Hi, I see something strange when I do a search with M-x notmuch-search from the notmuch-hello vs hitting "s" on the notmuch-hello buffer. If I startup notmuch and then do a M-x notmuch-search and then *, I see the messages with the newest on the top. But if I instead, startup notmuch and then

unread message appear `folded'

Hi, Pardon me for using non-standard terms here because of lack of knowledge of the language used in the email world. I have this thread in which some messages are tagged unread. When the thread is opened, I see that those unread messages are not shown in full in the threaded view. Instead they