'notmuch new' leaking memory and getting slower over time?

2012-12-10 Thread David Bremner
David Bremner writes: > > I'm marking this bug as fixed; feel free to let us know of any problems > with the new batch-tag format. I should say I mean the bug with message-ids with spaces in them. Performance issues with notmuch new (and particularly, bad prediction of completion times) remain,

'notmuch new' leaking memory and getting slower over time?

2012-12-10 Thread David Bremner
Petter Reinholdtsen writes: > Running 'notmuch restore' to get my tags back took 106 minutes, and I > was very surprised that the restore could not load all the tags stored > by 'notmuch dump'. The restore complained about this line: > > NO*TELEMAX**NORWAYII M0018001012307699038 (unread usit

Re: 'notmuch new' leaking memory and getting slower over time?

2012-12-10 Thread David Bremner
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com writes: Running 'notmuch restore' to get my tags back took 106 minutes, and I was very surprised that the restore could not load all the tags stored by 'notmuch dump'. The restore complained about this line: NO*TELEMAX**NORWAYII M0018001012307699038

Re: 'notmuch new' leaking memory and getting slower over time?

2012-12-10 Thread David Bremner
David Bremner brem...@unb.ca writes: I'm marking this bug as fixed; feel free to let us know of any problems with the new batch-tag format. I should say I mean the bug with message-ids with spaces in them. Performance issues with notmuch new (and particularly, bad prediction of completion

'notmuch new' leaking memory and getting slower over time?

2011-11-22 Thread Austin Clements
Quoth Petter Reinholdtsen on Nov 21 at 11:35 pm: > The indexing took 36 hours. At the start it claimed it would take 10 > hours, and it continued to underestimate the amount of time left until > the very end. It claimed to have 1 hour left when I checked before I > went to bed, and claimed to

'notmuch new' leaking memory and getting slower over time?

2011-11-22 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:35:34 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > NO*TELEMAX**NORWAYII M0018001012307699038 (unread usit year-2002) > > The message in question is a bounce from some X400 mail system, and its > message id look like this: > > Message-Id:

'notmuch new' leaking memory and getting slower over time?

2011-11-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
This weekend up updated my notmuch version to the 0.10 rc2 version available in Debian/unstable, and made a few observations I would like to share. I rebuilt the source on Debian/Squeeze to get it working for the machine I use to read email, and patched it to get the unsorted dump before