[Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-27 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:17:40 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for reporting this. > > Unfortunately, at the time, the test suite didn't capture everything > necessary to investigate the problem in the directory. In particular, > the actual vs. expected output only appeared on stdou

Re: [Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-27 Thread Carl Worth
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:50:37 +1000, Alex Ghitza wrote: > I wanted to wait until 0.3 to follow up on this. Sure enough, with 0.3 > I get "All 77 tests passed". Excellent! Great news! The only downside is that the code in 0.3 wouldn't have passes tests 78 and 79 (which haven't been written). Ex

[Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-27 Thread Carl Worth
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:50:37 +1000, Alex Ghitza wrote: > I wanted to wait until 0.3 to follow up on this. Sure enough, with 0.3 > I get "All 77 tests passed". Excellent! Great news! The only downside is that the code in 0.3 wouldn't have passes tests 78 and 79 (which haven't been written). Ex

Re: [Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-27 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:17:40 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for reporting this. > > Unfortunately, at the time, the test suite didn't capture everything > necessary to investigate the problem in the directory. In particular, > the actual vs. expected output only appeared on stdou

Re: [Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-23 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:49:01 +1000, Alex Ghitza wrote: > notmuch-0.2 built fine, but one test failed during 'make test'. I have > put the indicated directory up at > > http://aghitza.org/files/test.16707 Hi Alex, Thanks for reporting this. Unfortunately, at the time, the test suite didn't cap

[Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-23 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:49:01 +1000, Alex Ghitza wrote: > notmuch-0.2 built fine, but one test failed during 'make test'. I have > put the indicated directory up at > > http://aghitza.org/files/test.16707 Hi Alex, Thanks for reporting this. Unfortunately, at the time, the test suite didn't cap

[Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-17 Thread Alex Ghitza
Hi, I'm not sure whether replying to the announcement email is the appropriate way to report building and testing results, but here goes. notmuch-0.2 built fine, but one test failed during 'make test'. I have put the indicated directory up at http://aghitza.org/files/test.16707 with a tarred

Re: [Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-16 Thread Alex Ghitza
Hi, I'm not sure whether replying to the announcement email is the appropriate way to report building and testing results, but here goes. notmuch-0.2 built fine, but one test failed during 'make test'. I have put the indicated directory up at http://aghitza.org/files/test.16707 with a tarred

[Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-16 Thread Carl Worth
This is the second release of the notmuch mail system, with actual detailed release notes this time! This release consists of a number of minor new features that make notmuch more pleasant to use, and a few fairly major bug fixes. We didn't quite hit our release target of "about a week" from the

[Announce] notmuch release 0.2 now available

2010-04-16 Thread Carl Worth
This is the second release of the notmuch mail system, with actual detailed release notes this time! This release consists of a number of minor new features that make notmuch more pleasant to use, and a few fairly major bug fixes. We didn't quite hit our release target of "about a week" from the