Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> PS: last moment revelation: perhaps I could use just (13:15:14 +0300) there;
> still if I'd be the single user of that...
What about crossing the date line?
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.
On Sun, Aug 16 2015, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>> Now I took a little better look why the 'relative' date is not enough for
>> me is that it doesn't always show the local date (it shows like
>> (28 mins. ago) or (March 30)). If these were (28 mins. ago (07:22)) and
>> (March
Tomi Ollila writes:
> Now I took a little better look why the 'relative' date is not enough for
> me is that it doesn't always show the local date (it shows like
> (28 mins. ago) or (March 30)). If these were (28 mins. ago (07:22)) and
> (March 30 16:20) then it would be better (w/ +0300 that mi
Tomi Ollila writes:
> Now I took a little better look why the 'relative' date is not enough for
> me is that it doesn't always show the local date (it shows like
> (28 mins. ago) or (March 30)). If these were (28 mins. ago (07:22)) and
> (March 30 16:20) then it would be better (w/ +0300 that mi
On Thu, Apr 02 2015, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>> When adding Date: header of a message to notmuch-show buffer, compare the
>> date string with local representation of it and if these differ, output
>> Date: {original-date-string} ({local-date-representation})
>
> One thing I
On Thu, Apr 02 2015, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>> When adding Date: header of a message to notmuch-show buffer, compare the
>> date string with local representation of it and if these differ, output
>> Date: {original-date-string} ({local-date-representation})
>
> One thing I
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> From: Tomi Ollila
>
> When adding Date: header of a message to notmuch-show buffer, compare the
> date string with local representation of it and if these differ, output
> Date: {original-date-string} ({local-date-representation})
>
> This is useful e.g.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> From: Tomi Ollila
>
> When adding Date: header of a message to notmuch-show buffer, compare the
> date string with local representation of it and if these differ, output
> Date: {original-date-string} ({local-date-representation})
>
> This is useful e.g.
Tomi Ollila writes:
> When adding Date: header of a message to notmuch-show buffer, compare the
> date string with local representation of it and if these differ, output
> Date: {original-date-string} ({local-date-representation})
One thing I found confusing is that the local date representatio
Tomi Ollila writes:
> When adding Date: header of a message to notmuch-show buffer, compare the
> date string with local representation of it and if these differ, output
> Date: {original-date-string} ({local-date-representation})
One thing I found confusing is that the local date representatio
From: Tomi Ollila
When adding Date: header of a message to notmuch-show buffer, compare the
date string with local representation of it and if these differ, output
Date: {original-date-string} ({local-date-representation})
This is useful e.g. when mail system provides Date: strings with
differe
From: Tomi Ollila
When adding Date: header of a message to notmuch-show buffer, compare the
date string with local representation of it and if these differ, output
Date: {original-date-string} ({local-date-representation})
This is useful e.g. when mail system provides Date: strings with
differe
12 matches
Mail list logo
