Re: [FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-29 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:54:54 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:20:39 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:54:54 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:20:39 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth > SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari > > > wrote: > >

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:20:39 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > > > I, for one, simply have a get-mail script > > > which calls offlineimap, notmuch new, and

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-25 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > > I, for one, simply have a get-mail script > > which calls offlineimap, notmuch new, and finally my sorting > > script. This seems like a more straightforward way to manage

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > I, for one, simply have a get-mail script > which calls offlineimap, notmuch new, and finally my sorting > script. This seems like a more straightforward way to manage this; I have notmuch new and my sorting script run as posthooks in my

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-25 Thread Ben Gamari
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:27:45 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > Hi, > > Am I alone thinking it could be cool to specify a post-processing script > to run after 'notmuch new' ? > > Currently, one can tell notmuch to add a unique tag but I guess we could > extend this to something much smarter. I

Re: [FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-25 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote: I, for one, simply have a get-mail script which calls offlineimap, notmuch new, and finally my sorting script. This seems like a more

Re: [FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:20:39 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote: I, for one, simply have a get-mail script which calls

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, Am I alone thinking it could be cool to specify a post-processing script to run after 'notmuch new' ? Currently, one can tell notmuch to add a unique tag but I guess we could extend this to something much smarter. I guess I am not alone using a tagging script after each refresh. What do you

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, Am I alone thinking it could be cool to specify a post-processing script to run after 'notmuch new' ? Currently, one can tell notmuch to add a unique tag but I guess we could extend this to something much smarter. I guess I am not alone using a tagging script after each refresh. What do you