On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:49:22 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> I have modified the patch slightly and I think that it could solve the
> above points. The release process should be modified this way: you skip
> point 5 (increment the notmuch version in
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:49:22 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
I have modified the patch slightly and I think that it could solve the
above points. The release process should be modified this way: you skip
point 5 (increment the notmuch
enough. Then
> we could drop this rule:
>
> > +version:
> > + git describe > $@
I put it completely as part of TAR_FILE creation. If it was only
generated during release process, make dist would produce non-compilable
archives.
-Michal
--8<-------cut here-------
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:11:28 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
>
> > But, there are people without git installed that download the release
> > tarball. So if this patch makes it, we need to replace this with a
> > static version number when baking a
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:11:28 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
But, there are people without git installed that download the release
tarball. So if this patch makes it, we need to replace this with a
static version number when
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On 2010-04-06, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > I often have several versions of notmuch compiled and it would be very
> > helpful to be able to distinguish between them. Git has a very nice
> > feature to make intermediate numbering automatic and
On 2010-04-06, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I often have several versions of notmuch compiled and it would be very
> helpful to be able to distinguish between them. Git has a very nice
> feature to make intermediate numbering automatic and unambiguous so
> let's use it here.
But, there are people
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> In trying to get notmuch to grow up a little bit, I've just added a
> version number (0.1 initially) and have started doing releases. My idea
> for now is to have 2-part versions for releases, and 3-part versions to
> indicate intermediate states within
