On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp
wrote:
> From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
>
> scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
> "collected in array namelist which is allocated via
> malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
> all the
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu
wrote:
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp et...@betacantrips.com
scandir() returns strings allocated via malloc(3) which are then
collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3). Currently we just free the array
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp
wrote:
> From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
>
> scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
> "collected in array namelist which is allocated via
> malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
> all the
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp
wrote:
> From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
>
> scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
> "collected in array namelist which is allocated via
> malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
> all the
On 02/07/2012 05:10 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> Please use --subject-prefix='PATCH vN' parameter when sending new
> versions of patches. Also, sending new versions as replies to the first
> email in the original thread makes it easier to track.
Oops! Thanks again.
Ethan
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
"collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
all the entries of namelist, and then free namelist.
entry
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:02:49 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp
wrote:
> From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
>
> scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
> "collected in array namelist which is allocated via
> malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
> all the
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp et...@betacantrips.com
scandir() returns strings allocated via malloc(3) which are then
collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3). Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
all the entries of namelist, and then free namelist.
entry only
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu
wrote:
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp et...@betacantrips.com
scandir() returns strings allocated via malloc(3) which are then
collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3). Currently we just free the array
On 02/07/2012 05:10 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
Please use --subject-prefix='PATCH vN' parameter when sending new
versions of patches. Also, sending new versions as replies to the first
email in the original thread makes it easier to track.
Oops! Thanks again.
Ethan
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu
wrote:
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp et...@betacantrips.com
scandir() returns strings allocated via malloc(3) which are then
collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3). Currently we just free the array
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
"collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
all the entries of namelist, and then free namelist.
entry
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp et...@betacantrips.com
scandir() returns strings allocated via malloc(3) which are then
collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3). Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
all the entries of namelist, and then free namelist.
entry only
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:02:49 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu
wrote:
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp et...@betacantrips.com
scandir() returns strings allocated via malloc(3) which are then
collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3). Currently we just free the array
14 matches
Mail list logo