On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:21:53 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:58:27 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > When displaying threads as result of a search it makes sense to list those
> > authors first who match the search. The matching authors are separated from
> > the
> >
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:21:53 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:58:27 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org
wrote:
When displaying threads as result of a search it makes sense to list those
authors first who match the search. The matching authors are
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:58:27 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> When displaying threads as result of a search it makes sense to list those
> authors first who match the search. The matching authors are separated from
> the
> non-matching ones with a '|' instead of a ','
It seems a reasonable feature
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:58:27 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
When displaying threads as result of a search it makes sense to list those
authors first who match the search. The matching authors are separated from
the
non-matching ones with a '|' instead of a ','
It seems a
When displaying threads as result of a search it makes sense to list those
authors first who match the search. The matching authors are separated from the
non-matching ones with a '|' instead of a ','
Imagine the default "+inbox" query. Those mails in the thread that
match the query are actually
When displaying threads as result of a search it makes sense to list those
authors first who match the search. The matching authors are separated from the
non-matching ones with a '|' instead of a ','
Imagine the default +inbox query. Those mails in the thread that
match the query are actually
