Le 28 juin 2012 ? 18:21 CEST, Jameson Graef Rollins a ?crit :
> On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of
>> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having
>> some key binding to add the rest of the recipi
Jesse Rosenthal writes:
...
> If it's not obvious, I'm pretty strongly against Carl's roll-back. I
> could, of course, just uncomment my old correction in my .emacs, but I
> think it's a change that could hurt users. Those who are more likely to
> prefer the reply-all behavior are more likely to
On Jun 28, 2012 3:06 AM, "David Bremner" wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > This restores the original keybinding and uses the new keybinding for
> > > the new feature.
>
> My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...
And mine in that I sent the origin
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...
And mine in that the first thing I did in my .emacs, back in 2009 or so,
was write a reply-to-sender function, and reverse the behavior. In fact,
I just got around to using the built-in
Philip Hands writes:
> I find the change to the new (only reply to sender) behaviour serously
> irritating, because it seems I cannot train myself to hit R all the time
> (which is pretty much what I always want).
I'm in a similar camp. I tried (and failed) to adopt to the current
mode, (once I r
Philip Hands writes:
> I find the change to the new (only reply to sender) behaviour serously
> irritating, because it seems I cannot train myself to hit R all the time
> (which is pretty much what I always want).
I'm in a similar camp. I tried (and failed) to adopt to the current
mode, (once I r
Le 28 juin 2012 à 18:21 CEST, Jameson Graef Rollins a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of
>> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having
>> some key binding to add the rest of the recipi
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands wrote:
> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of
> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having
> some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip
> between the two options so one can cha
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands wrote:
> Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of
> letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having
> some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip
> between the two options so one can cha
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> Of course, it is not my project so I am happy to go along with whatever
> choice is made.
I think everyone who has put in time and effort to make the project
great can claim a little bit of ownership. And that certainly includes
you, Mark.
jamie.
pgp
On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> Of course, it is not my project so I am happy to go along with whatever
> choice is made.
I think everyone who has put in time and effort to make the project
great can claim a little bit of ownership. And that certainly includes
you, Mark.
jamie.
-
Jesse Rosenthal writes:
...
> If it's not obvious, I'm pretty strongly against Carl's roll-back. I
> could, of course, just uncomment my old correction in my .emacs, but I
> think it's a change that could hurt users. Those who are more likely to
> prefer the reply-all behavior are more likely to
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...
And mine in that the first thing I did in my .emacs, back in 2009 or so,
was write a reply-to-sender function, and reverse the behavior. In fact,
I just got around to using the built-in
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
>> > Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
>> > of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally
On Jun 28, 2012 3:06 AM, "David Bremner" wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > This restores the original keybinding and uses the new keybinding for
> > > the new feature.
>
> My bias is probably apparent in that I pushed the original patch...
And mine in that I sent the origin
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, David Bremner wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
>> > Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
>> > of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> > Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
> > of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
> >
> > Then, before release 0.12 the emacs inte
On Wed, 27.06.2012 19:55, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> I actually rebound these keys immediately after the release, so I'm
> perfectly happy to change back.
Same here.
I think the ratio of cases where I wanted to reply to all
participants instead compared to just to the sender is something like
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:55:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> > Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
> > of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
> >
> > Then, before release 0.12 the emacs int
On Wed, 27.06.2012 19:55, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> I actually rebound these keys immediately after the release, so I'm
> perfectly happy to change back.
Same here.
I think the ratio of cases where I wanted to reply to all
participants instead compared to just to the sender is something like
On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
> of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
>
> Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new
> reply-to-sender only feature. In commit
> f02b475fa78
On Wed, Jun 27 2012, Carl Worth wrote:
> Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
> of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
>
> Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new
> reply-to-sender only feature. In commit
> f02b475fa78
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new
reply-to-sender only feature. In commit
f02b475fa781bb5df3358c73213e7633a99f016e the new feature was p
Since the beginning of time, the emacs interface provided a keybinding
of 'r' to reply to a message, (and originally, all recipients).
Then, before release 0.12 the emacs interface acquired a new
reply-to-sender only feature. In commit
f02b475fa781bb5df3358c73213e7633a99f016e the new feature was p
24 matches
Mail list logo
