On Wed, 19 May 2010 07:44:18 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add `notmuch-show-relative-dates' to control whether the summary line
> in `notmuch-show' mode displays relative dates (e.g. '26 mins. ago') or
> the full date string from the message. Default to `t' for
> compatibility with the previous
On Wed, 19 May 2010 07:44:18 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add `notmuch-show-relative-dates' to control whether the summary line
> in `notmuch-show' mode displays relative dates (e.g. '26 mins. ago') or
> the full date string from the message. Default to `t' for
> compatibility with the previous
On Wed, 19 May 2010 07:44:18 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add `notmuch-show-relative-dates' to control whether the summary line
> in `notmuch-show' mode displays relative dates (e.g. '26 mins. ago') or
> the full date string from the message. Default to `t' for
> compatibility with the previous
On Wed, 19 May 2010 07:44:18 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add `notmuch-show-relative-dates' to control whether the summary line
> in `notmuch-show' mode displays relative dates (e.g. '26 mins. ago') or
> the full date string from the message. Default to `t' for
> compatibility with the previous
Add `notmuch-show-relative-dates' to control whether the summary line
in `notmuch-show' mode displays relative dates (e.g. '26 mins. ago') or
the full date string from the message. Default to `t' for
compatibility with the previous behaviour.
---
Re:
> one thing I'd love for 0.4 (and haven't seen
Add `notmuch-show-relative-dates' to control whether the summary line
in `notmuch-show' mode displays relative dates (e.g. '26 mins. ago') or
the full date string from the message. Default to `t' for
compatibility with the previous behaviour.
---
Re:
> one thing I'd love for 0.4 (and haven't seen
