On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:49:46 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:15:08 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > -- >8 --
> > Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Clarify description of thread manipulating functions
> >
> > It is not clear whether the term "thread" refers to the thread in the
> >
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:21:26 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:13:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > Something like this might help save you some time:
> > (assuming you'd rather not leave Emacs to apply patches)
>
> Thanks, I already have a one line git alias ;).
>
err, in
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:13:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Something like this might help save you some time:
> (assuming you'd rather not leave Emacs to apply patches)
Thanks, I already have a one line git alias ;).
d
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:49:46 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:15:08 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
-- 8 --
Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Clarify description of thread manipulating functions
It is not clear whether the term thread refers to
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:13:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Something like this might help save you some time:
(assuming you'd rather not leave Emacs to apply patches)
Thanks, I already have a one line git alias ;).
d
___
notmuch mailing
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:21:26 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:13:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Something like this might help save you some time:
(assuming you'd rather not leave Emacs to apply patches)
Thanks, I already have a one line
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:15:08 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Clarify description of thread manipulating functions
>
> It is not clear whether the term "thread" refers to the thread in the
> database or to the thread currently shown in a buffer. Those two
>
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:15:08 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
-- 8 --
Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Clarify description of thread manipulating functions
It is not clear whether the term thread refers to the thread in the
database or to the thread currently shown in a buffer. Those
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:44:18 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
> documentation of `notmuch-show-archive-thread' stayed hidden from users,
> because no key is bound to this function.
>
> This patch copies the important paragraph
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:15:08 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> [...]
> OK, at least one supporter here :) The updated patch follows:
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Clarify description of thread manipulating functions
>
> It is not clear whether the term "thread" refers to the thread in the
>
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:15:08 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
[...]
OK, at least one supporter here :) The updated patch follows:
-- 8 --
Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Clarify description of thread manipulating functions
It is not clear whether the term thread refers to the thread
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:33:00 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Feb 19, 2012 12:44 AM, "Michal Sojka" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
> > > >
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:33:00 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2012 12:44 AM, "Michal Sojka" wrote:
> > >
> > > After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
> > > documentation of `notmuch-show-archive-thread' stayed
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:33:00 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Feb 19, 2012 12:44 AM, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
documentation of
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:33:00 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Feb 19, 2012 12:44 AM, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important
On Feb 19, 2012 12:44 AM, "Michal Sojka" wrote:
>
> After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
> documentation of `notmuch-show-archive-thread' stayed hidden from users,
> because no key is bound to this function.
>
> This patch copies the important paragraph to the
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2012 12:44 AM, "Michal Sojka" wrote:
> >
> > After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
> > documentation of `notmuch-show-archive-thread' stayed hidden from users,
> > because no key is bound to this function.
> >
After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
documentation of `notmuch-show-archive-thread' stayed hidden from users,
because no key is bound to this function.
This patch copies the important paragraph to the documentation of
functions currently bound to keys.
---
After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
documentation of `notmuch-show-archive-thread' stayed hidden from users,
because no key is bound to this function.
This patch copies the important paragraph to the documentation of
functions currently bound to keys.
---
On Feb 19, 2012 12:44 AM, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
documentation of `notmuch-show-archive-thread' stayed hidden from users,
because no key is bound to this function.
This patch copies the important
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Feb 19, 2012 12:44 AM, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
After recent rework of a/A/x/X key bindings, the important paragraph in
documentation of `notmuch-show-archive-thread' stayed hidden from users,
because no key is bound to this
21 matches
Mail list logo
