On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:41:10 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Carl. I could do this, but I think I would ultimately just be
> submitting patches for notmuch to behave in the specific way that I want
> it to behave. I'm pretty sure that everyone has different ideas of what
> they want, and I
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:41:10 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, Carl. I could do this, but I think I would ultimately just be
submitting patches for notmuch to behave in the specific way that I want
it to behave. I'm pretty sure that everyone has different ideas of
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:35:31 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> These look fairly handy.
>
> But, since I know our current keybindings are less-than-perfect, I would
> prefer to see patches that also fix them, (rather than just adding
> functionality that new users can't get at without manual
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:09:01 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> While these are not currently bound to any keys, I have found them to
> be very useful for constructing custom key bindings outside of what
> notmuch provides by default.
These look fairly handy.
But, since I know our current
Adding three new conveneince functions:
notmuch-show-next-open-message-or-pop
notmuch-show-next-thread
notmuch-show-previous-thread
While these are not currently bound to any keys, I have found them to
be very useful for constructing custom key bindings outside of what
notmuch provides by
