On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:46:19 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:23:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:45 -0400, David Bremner
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, "David
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:34:12 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
> >
> > ---
>
> Sorry, it conflicts with Jamie's patches that I just pushed.
>
Please don't apologize for doing the
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:59:32 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:03:59 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:41:36 -0400, David Bremner
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > > wrote:
> > > > Less code, same results, without
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:23:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:45 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, "David Bremner" wrote:
> > >
> > > Sometimes someone (Dmitry?) sent patches that
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:23:40 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:45 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:34:12 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
---
Sorry, it conflicts with Jamie's patches that I just pushed.
Please don't
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:46:19 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:23:40 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:45 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
>
> ---
Sorry, it conflicts with Jamie's patches that I just pushed.
d
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:03:59 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:41:36 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > wrote:
> > > Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
> > >
> >
> > This looks OK, although the
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:45 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, "David Bremner" wrote:
> >
> > Sometimes someone (Dmitry?) sent patches that separated a small functional
> > change, and the big non-functional
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:41:36 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
> >
>
> This looks OK, although the re-indenting makes these kind of changes
> painful to review (not that I'm
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, "David Bremner" wrote:
>
> Sometimes someone (Dmitry?) sent patches that separated a small functional
> change, and the big non-functional indentation change it caused,
> separately. Would you prefer (or tolerate
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
>
This looks OK, although the re-indenting makes these kind of changes
painful to review (not that I'm suggesting we should re-indent, just
some random complaining).
d
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
This looks OK, although the re-indenting makes these kind of changes
painful to review (not that I'm suggesting we should re-indent, just
some random complaining).
On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:17:18 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
This looks OK, although the re-indenting makes these kind of changes
painful to review (not
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Sometimes someone (Dmitry?) sent patches that separated a small functional
change, and the big non-functional indentation change it caused,
separately. Would
Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 20 +---
emacs/notmuch-wash.el | 47 +++
emacs/notmuch.el | 28 +---
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 50
Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 20 +---
emacs/notmuch-wash.el | 47 +++
emacs/notmuch.el | 28 +---
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 50
18 matches
Mail list logo
