Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2020-04-03 Thread David Bremner
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > nmbug and notmuch-report are developer tools. It's 2018, and all > developers should have python3 available. > Pushed. d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2020-03-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2020-03-12 18:57:51 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > I've been running nmbug with a wrapper that runs python 2.7 (since default > python in that particular machine is python 2.6 -- which doesn't work with > nmbug (or it may but that is complicated, i'm not sure...). > > So, to me just doing

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2020-03-12 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Thu, Mar 12 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Two years later, I'd like to re-propose this patch that moves nmbug to > python3. > > I have read what PEP 394 says (thanks for the pointer, Trevor!) but in > practice (a) i do not see debian pointing /usr/bin/python to python3 any > time in the

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2020-03-12 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Two years later, I'd like to re-propose this patch that moves nmbug to python3. I have read what PEP 394 says (thanks for the pointer, Trevor!) but in practice (a) i do not see debian pointing /usr/bin/python to python3 any time in the near future, (b) python2 is officially EOL, and (c) i don't

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-18 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2018-02-12 09:53:33 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > That Python-2-only tool should be using python2 in its shebang. This > is exactly the sort of issue that PEP 394 was created to address. Thanks for the suggestion, i've asked them to do that: https://bugs.debian.org/890282 > Once you

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-15 Thread W. Trevor King
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 07:37:53AM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > In this case I value Trevor as valid notmuch maintainer as anyone > else who has done significant work for nmbug. Thanks, but I don't think that should impact the decision for this patch. I'm just sharing my take, but the eventual

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-14 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Mon, Feb 12 2018, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:56:36PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> On Fri 2018-02-09 12:46:24 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: >> > From later on in PEP 394 [1]: >> > >> > It is anticipated that there will eventually come a time where >> > the

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-12 Thread W. Trevor King
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:56:36PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Fri 2018-02-09 12:46:24 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > > From later on in PEP 394 [1]: > > > > It is anticipated that there will eventually come a time where > > the third party ecosystem surrounding Python 3 is

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2018-02-09 12:46:24 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > From later on in PEP 394 [1]: > > It is anticipated that there will eventually come a time where the > third party ecosystem surrounding Python 3 is sufficiently mature > for this recommendation to be updated to suggest that the

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-09 Thread W. Trevor King
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:36:48PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Is there something using python3 gets you for nmbug that you miss > > with python2? > > Yep, i get to remove python 2 from my operating system :) > > Smaller installed codebase, fewer bugs. There are only two > outstanding

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2018-02-09 09:12:57 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:32:11PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> nmbug and notmuch-report are developer tools. It's 2018, and all >> developers should have python3 available. > > From PEP 394 [1]: > > One exception to this is

Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-09 Thread W. Trevor King
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:32:11PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > nmbug and notmuch-report are developer tools. It's 2018, and all > developers should have python3 available. From PEP 394 [1]: One exception to this is scripts that are deliberately written to be source compatible with

[PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3

2018-02-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
nmbug and notmuch-report are developer tools. It's 2018, and all developers should have python3 available. Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor --- devel/nmbug/nmbug | 2 +- devel/nmbug/notmuch-report | 5 ++--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)