On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs
> tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally
> interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler
> because we do not need to capture stderr.
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs
> tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally
> interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler
> because we do not need to capture stderr.
>
The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs
tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally
interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler
because we do not need to capture stderr.
Also, the patch works around an Emacs (23.3+1-1 on current Debian
Uns
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs
> tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally
> interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler
> because we do not need to capture stderr.
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs
> tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally
> interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler
> because we do not need to capture stderr.
>
The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs
tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally
interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler
because we do not need to capture stderr.
Also, the patch works around an Emacs (23.3+1-1 on current Debian
Uns