[PATCH] test: use `princ' instead of `message' calls in emacs tests

2011-05-27 Thread Carl Worth
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs > tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally > interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler > because we do not need to capture stderr.

Re: [PATCH] test: use `princ' instead of `message' calls in emacs tests

2011-05-27 Thread Carl Worth
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler because we do not

[PATCH] test: use `princ' instead of `message' calls in emacs tests

2011-05-10 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler because we do not need to capture stderr. Also, the patch works around an Emacs (23.3+1-1 on current Debian

[PATCH] test: use `princ' instead of `message' calls in emacs tests

2011-05-10 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs > tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally > interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler > because we do not need to capture stderr.

Re: [PATCH] test: use `princ' instead of `message' calls in emacs tests

2011-05-10 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:08 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: The patch replaces all (message (buffer-string)) calls in emacs tests with (princ (buffer-string)). This avoids accidentally interpreting '%' as format specifiers and makes code simpler because we do not