[PATCH] vim: fix regex after "notmuch show" output change

2012-04-21 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Jakob wrote: > The new field "excluded" was added to the output and made this regex fail. > --- > ?vim/plugin/notmuch.vim | ? ?5 +++-- > ?1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim b/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim > index

Re: [PATCH] vim: fix regex after notmuch show output change

2012-04-20 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Jakob ja...@pipefour.org wrote: The new field excluded was added to the output and made this regex fail. ---  vim/plugin/notmuch.vim |    5 +++--  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim b/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after "notmuch show" output change

2012-03-30 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Jakob wrote: > The new field "excluded" was added to the output and made this regex fail. > --- LGTM. Tomi > vim/plugin/notmuch.vim |5 +++-- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim b/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim > index

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after "notmuch show" output change

2012-03-29 Thread Jakob
The new field "excluded" was added to the output and made this regex fail. --- vim/plugin/notmuch.vim |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim b/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim index 21985c7..8f27fb9 100644 --- a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim +++

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after "notmuch show" output change

2012-03-29 Thread Jakob
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:42:53 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: > I meant about the syntax: \([[0-9]*\) i.e. 2 opening [[:s Good eye! The regex worked, but I guess I was matching digits /and/ open-brackets. I'll fix that. Thanks, Jakob

Re: [PATCH] vim: fix regex after notmuch show output change

2012-03-29 Thread Jakob
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:42:53 +0300, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: I meant about the syntax: \([[0-9]*\) i.e. 2 opening [[:s Good eye! The regex worked, but I guess I was matching digits /and/ open-brackets. I'll fix that. Thanks, Jakob ___

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after notmuch show output change

2012-03-29 Thread Jakob
The new field excluded was added to the output and made this regex fail. --- vim/plugin/notmuch.vim |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim b/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim index 21985c7..8f27fb9 100644 --- a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim +++

Re: [PATCH] vim: fix regex after notmuch show output change

2012-03-29 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Jakob ja...@pipefour.org wrote: The new field excluded was added to the output and made this regex fail. --- LGTM. Tomi vim/plugin/notmuch.vim |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after "notmuch show" output change

2012-03-25 Thread Tomi Ollila
Jakob writes: > On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:58:59 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> Is this regexp part below good ? >> >> > +... match:\([0-9]*\) excluded:\([[0-9]*\) filename:\(.*\)$', ... >> >> ( --> excluded:\([[0-9]*\) <-- ) > > Yeah, that was the core of the change. With this new field

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after "notmuch show" output change

2012-03-25 Thread Jakob
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:58:59 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > Is this regexp part below good ? > > > +... match:\([0-9]*\) excluded:\([[0-9]*\) filename:\(.*\)$', ... > > ( --> excluded:\([[0-9]*\) <-- ) Yeah, that was the core of the change. With this new field in the output, the old

Re: [PATCH] vim: fix regex after notmuch show output change

2012-03-25 Thread Jakob
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:58:59 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: Is this regexp part below good ? +... match:\([0-9]*\) excluded:\([[0-9]*\) filename:\(.*\)$', ... ( -- excluded:\([[0-9]*\) -- ) Yeah, that was the core of the change. With this new field in the output,

Re: [PATCH] vim: fix regex after notmuch show output change

2012-03-25 Thread Tomi Ollila
Jakob ja...@pipefour.org writes: On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:58:59 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: Is this regexp part below good ? +... match:\([0-9]*\) excluded:\([[0-9]*\) filename:\(.*\)$', ... ( -- excluded:\([[0-9]*\) -- ) Yeah, that was the core of the change.

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after "notmuch show" output change

2012-03-24 Thread Tomi Ollila
Jakob writes: > The new field "excluded" was added to the output and made this regex fail. > --- Is this regexp part below good ? > +... match:\([0-9]*\) excluded:\([[0-9]*\) filename:\(.*\)$', ... ( --> excluded:\([[0-9]*\) <-- ) Otherwise lookg good (I think). Tomi >

Re: [PATCH] vim: fix regex after notmuch show output change

2012-03-24 Thread Tomi Ollila
Jakob ja...@pipefour.org writes: The new field excluded was added to the output and made this regex fail. --- Is this regexp part below good ? +... match:\([0-9]*\) excluded:\([[0-9]*\) filename:\(.*\)$', ... ( -- excluded:\([[0-9]*\) -- ) Otherwise lookg good (I think). Tomi

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after "notmuch show" output change

2012-03-21 Thread Jakob
The new field "excluded" was added to the output and made this regex fail. --- vim/plugin/notmuch.vim |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim b/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim index 21985c7..92e1b50 100644 --- a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim +++

[PATCH] vim: fix regex after notmuch show output change

2012-03-21 Thread Jakob
The new field excluded was added to the output and made this regex fail. --- vim/plugin/notmuch.vim |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim b/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim index 21985c7..92e1b50 100644 --- a/vim/plugin/notmuch.vim +++