On Fri 2018-06-15 07:16:05 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>
>> +notmuch_status_t
>> +_notmuch_message_crypto_set_sig_list (_notmuch_message_crypto_t
>> *msg_crypto, GMimeSignatureList *sigs)
>> +{
>
> It's a bit confusing that nothing in this API/patch seems to use the
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> +notmuch_status_t
> +_notmuch_message_crypto_set_sig_list (_notmuch_message_crypto_t *msg_crypto,
> GMimeSignatureList *sigs)
> +{
It's a bit confusing that nothing in this API/patch seems to use the
sig_list stored by this function
> +void
> +_notmuch_message_cry
E-mail encryption and signatures reported by notmuch are at the MIME
part level. This makes sense in the dirty details, but for users we
need to have a per-message conception of the cryptographic state of
the e-mail. (see
https://dkg.fifthhorseman.net/blog/e-mail-cryptography.html for more
discus