Re: [PATCH 2/2] legacy-display: drop tests that try to match headers in a Legacy Display part

2020-01-08 Thread David Bremner
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > These tests were an attempt to establish that the content of the > "Legacy Display" part is the same as the actual protected headers of > the message. But this is more conservative than we need to be. pushed. d ___

Re: [PATCH 2/2] legacy-display: drop tests that try to match headers in a Legacy Display part

2019-12-28 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Mon, Dec 23 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > These tests were an attempt to establish that the content of the > "Legacy Display" part is the same as the actual protected headers of > the message. But this is more conservative than we need to be. > >

[PATCH 2/2] legacy-display: drop tests that try to match headers in a Legacy Display part

2019-12-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
These tests were an attempt to establish that the content of the "Legacy Display" part is the same as the actual protected headers of the message. But this is more conservative than we need to be. https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-autocrypt-lamps-protected-headers-02.html section 5.3 makes clear