Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Nov 22 at 8:15 am:
> On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> > This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
> > normal search summary output but with a list of message ids
> > too. Currently this is not implemented for text format.
>
>
On Fri, Nov 23 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
normal search
On Fri, Nov 23 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Nov 22 at 8:15 am:
On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
normal search summary output but with a list of message ids
too. Currently this is not implemented for
On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
>>> This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
>>> normal search summary output but with a list of message ids
>>> too.
Hi
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
>> This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
>> normal search summary output but with a list of message ids
>> too. Currently this is not implemented for text format.
>
On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> I guess there would still be a race condition, especially for really
> long search results, but I wonder if the calls could actually be made
> in parallel at the same time.
If we are nitpicking, strictly speaking, running things in parallel does
On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
> normal search summary output but with a list of message ids
> too. Currently this is not implemented for text format.
Hey, Mark. Very nit-picky comment here, but I'm not sure
On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
normal search summary output but with a list of message ids
too. Currently this is not implemented for text format.
Hey, Mark. Very nit-picky comment here,
On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
I guess there would still be a race condition, especially for really
long search results, but I wonder if the calls could actually be made
in parallel at the same time.
If we are nitpicking, strictly speaking, running things in parallel does
Hi
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
normal search summary output but with a list of message ids
too. Currently
On Thu, Nov 22 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09 2012, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
normal
This adds a --output=with-ids option which gives similar output to the
normal search summary output but with a list of message ids
too. Currently this is not implemented for text format.
---
notmuch-search.c | 40 ++--
1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2
13 matches
Mail list logo