Re: [PATCH 3/5] build: optionally build python-cffi bindings

2020-05-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2019-11-04 23:26:25 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > how bad does out-of-tree build break with this -- do we need to do > the same as with ruby bindings (copy sources -- do we still do so)? or does > python provide better alternative..? I've just posted

Re: [PATCH 3/5] build: optionally build python-cffi bindings

2019-11-04 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > how bad does out-of-tree build break with this -- do we need to do > the same as with ruby bindings (copy sources -- do we still do so)? or does > python provide better alternative..? Good question. What is here will break with out of tree builds, just from trivial things

Re: [PATCH 3/5] build: optionally build python-cffi bindings

2019-11-04 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Nov 03 2019, David Bremner wrote: > Put the build product (and tests) in a well known location so that we > can find them e.g. from the tests. > --- > Makefile.local | 2 +- > bindings/Makefile.local | 9 + > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff

[PATCH 3/5] build: optionally build python-cffi bindings

2019-11-03 Thread David Bremner
Put the build product (and tests) in a well known location so that we can find them e.g. from the tests. --- Makefile.local | 2 +- bindings/Makefile.local | 9 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile.local b/Makefile.local index