On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:01:21 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> The others are (not too surprisingly) stale and need rebasing. I'm also
> not clear on whether we have concensus on whether the patches are
> suitable for inclusion, so feedback from others would be welcome
> (perhaps before Daniel goes
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 20:46:54 +0200, Daniel Schoepe wrote:
> This version fixes the issues mentioned by Austin and highlights the currently
> displayed message in the outline buffer. My previous issues with
> 'point-entered
> and 'point-left were caused by linum-mode, so don't enable it for
>
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 20:46:54 +0200, Daniel Schoepe
daniel.scho...@googlemail.com wrote:
This version fixes the issues mentioned by Austin and highlights the currently
displayed message in the outline buffer. My previous issues with
'point-entered
and 'point-left were caused by linum-mode, so
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:01:21 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
The others are (not too surprisingly) stale and need rebasing. I'm also
not clear on whether we have concensus on whether the patches are
suitable for inclusion, so feedback from others would be welcome
(perhaps before
This version fixes the issues mentioned by Austin and highlights the currently
displayed message in the outline buffer. My previous issues with 'point-entered
and 'point-left were caused by linum-mode, so don't enable it for notmuch-show
buffers.
I haven't had time yet to implement a more
This version fixes the issues mentioned by Austin and highlights the currently
displayed message in the outline buffer. My previous issues with 'point-entered
and 'point-left were caused by linum-mode, so don't enable it for notmuch-show
buffers.
I haven't had time yet to implement a more
