Hey there,
David Edmondson writes:
> On Friday, 2020-02-21 at 09:06:46 -08, William Casarin wrote:
>
>> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>>
>>> On Sat 2019-12-28 10:01:17 -0500, William Casarin wrote:
These patches bring notmuch-tree more in line with the user experience
of notmuch-show b
On Friday, 2020-02-21 at 09:06:46 -08, William Casarin wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>
>> On Sat 2019-12-28 10:01:17 -0500, William Casarin wrote:
>>> These patches bring notmuch-tree more in line with the user experience
>>> of notmuch-show by adding the x/X bindings.
>>
>> It looks like
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Sat 2019-12-28 10:01:17 -0500, William Casarin wrote:
>> These patches bring notmuch-tree more in line with the user experience
>> of notmuch-show by adding the x/X bindings.
>
> It looks like this series has been reviewed by dme, and is presumably
> approved by h
On Sat 2019-12-28 10:01:17 -0500, William Casarin wrote:
> These patches bring notmuch-tree more in line with the user experience
> of notmuch-show by adding the x/X bindings.
It looks like this series has been reviewed by dme, and is presumably
approved by him, with the exception of patch 3/7, wh
These patches bring notmuch-tree more in line with the user experience
of notmuch-show by adding the x/X bindings.
v3:
- Removed dubious setq assignments in notmuch-tree-next-thread
notmuch-tree-goto-matching-message as suggested in id:m2zhgg3r5y@dme.org
- Implement "A function scope
